Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;35(1):93-105.
doi: 10.1177/0890117120928789. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

A Systematic Review of Key Factors in the Effectiveness of Multisector Alliances in the Public Health Domain

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Key Factors in the Effectiveness of Multisector Alliances in the Public Health Domain

Bonnie Wiggins et al. Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic literature review is to assess the factors associated with synergistic multisector alliances in the public health domain.

Data source: Articles in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar between March 2009 and February 2019 were searched.

Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: Included alliances had a public health and behavioral focus, were from the public or private sector, and were multipartner and multisector, and from high-income countries. Public health research alliances were included, but clinical research alliances were excluded.

Data extraction: Data extraction included alliance description, alliance domain, country, single or multiple alliances, and the sectors included in the alliance. Two theoretical frameworks were used in data extraction.

Data synthesis: Data were coded according to 28 factors representing antecedents, management, and evaluation (Parent and Harvey model) and 3 output-specific factors (Bergen model).

Results: A final 24 papers were included, of which 58% contained synergistic alliances. While almost all factors reportedly enabled synergy, some factors were more frequently associated with synergistic alliances, including clear purpose and positive coordination, information sharing, and evaluation of project outcomes. Complexity within some factors was also reported.

Conclusion: The theoretical models were supported by the data. Public health alliances would likely benefit from incorporating factors identified as beneficial for synergy and from carefully considering the management of complex factors.

Keywords: alliance; collaboration; evaluation; health promotion; multisector partnerships; public health and literature review; synergy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Adaptation of Parent and Harvey model for sport and physical activity community-based partnerships., See Appendix A for definitions of each partnership attribute.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parent MM, Harvey J. Towards a management model for sport and physical activity community-based partnerships. Eur Sport Manage Quart. 2009;9(1):23–45.
    1. Vegetable Intake Strategic Alliance. 2019. https://www.vegkit.com.au/vegkit-project/vegetable-intake-strategic-alli.... Accessed December 5, 2019.
    1. Corbin JH, Mittelmark MB. Partnership lessons from the global programme for health promotion effectiveness: a case study. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(4):365–371. - PubMed
    1. Gillies P. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promot Int. 1998;13(2):99–120.
    1. Leurs MT, Mur-Veeman IM, van der Sar R, Schaalma HP, de Vries NK. Diagnosis of sustainable collaboration in health promotion—a case study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):382. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types