Is every patient eligible to have an office hysteroscopy? A retrospective analysis of 1301 procedures
- PMID: 32489495
- PMCID: PMC7233160
- DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.89609
Is every patient eligible to have an office hysteroscopy? A retrospective analysis of 1301 procedures
Abstract
Introduction: Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of uterine pathologies. The office setting seems to be safe, reducing the anesthesia risks and also decreasing the overall costs of the procedure. Recent literature suggests that hysteroscopy performed without anesthesia may not be as painless as it was previously considered. Moreover, not every patient can be referred for a hysteroscopy in an office setting.
Aim: To analyze the factors correlated with a successful hysteroscopy in an office setting.
Material and methods: We analyzed the documentation of 1301 patients who underwent hysteroscopy at our department in the period 2013-2016. The impact of the type of the procedure and the various demographic factors on the need for general anesthesia was assessed.
Results: Almost 80% of all hysteroscopies were performed without analgesia in an office setting. The remaining patients underwent a hysteroscopy in general anesthesia. The key aspect for successful office hysteroscopy is the scope of the performed surgery. Over 91% of diagnostic hysteroscopies have been done without analgesia, but only about 30% of extensive endometrial scratching procedures were performed in an office setting. A previous vaginal delivery increases the chances for a successful office hysteroscopy by about 21%, and in the case of diagnostic procedures, multiparous patients were at an about 79% lower risk of analgesia necessity.
Conclusions: It is possible to perform nearly all diagnostic hysteroscopies in an office setting. In the case of operative hysteroscopy, the most crucial factor is the scope of the procedure.
Keywords: anesthesia; hysteroscopy; office hysteroscopy; pain; vaginoscopy.
Copyright: © 2019 Fundacja Videochirurgii.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies.Fertil Steril. 2016 May;105(5):e16-e17. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.030. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26873675
-
Failed diagnostic hysteroscopy: Analysis of 62 cases.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Feb;245:193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.031. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 31864715
-
Three Thousand Cases of Office Hysteroscopy: See and Treat an Indian Experience.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Oct;70(5):384-389. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01334-4. Epub 2020 Jul 17. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020. PMID: 33041557 Free PMC article.
-
Hysteroscopy without anesthesia: review of recent literature.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.003. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20955981 Review.
-
Updates in office hysteroscopy: a practical decalogue to perform a correct procedure.Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):967-976. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00713-w. Epub 2020 Feb 1. Updates Surg. 2020. PMID: 32008214 Review.
Cited by
-
[Impact of vaginal delivery history on anesthesia management of hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia: a cohort study of 99 patients].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2022 Apr 20;42(4):591-597. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.04.16. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2022. PMID: 35527496 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Too big? A review of methods for removing large endometrial polyps in office minihysteroscopy - broadening the indications for the procedure in the COVID-19 pandemic.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):104-109. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.107762. Epub 2021 Jul 13. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022. PMID: 35251394 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of pain during diagnostic and surgical minihysteroscopy under local anesthesia.Arch Med Sci. 2023 Aug 17;21(2):463-470. doi: 10.5114/aoms/169979. eCollection 2025. Arch Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 40395882 Free PMC article.
-
Does "no-touch" technique hysteroscopy increase the risk of infection?Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 27;19(2):145-151. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.04272. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35770455 Free PMC article.
-
The application value of 5 Fr non-contact hysteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine diseases in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02680-0. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 39633348 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kamiński P, Ziółkowska K, Szymusik I, Gajewska M. The use of hysteroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of the septate uterus: author’s experience and literature review. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2006;1:101–9.
-
- Hassan A, Haggag H. Role of oral tramadol 50 mg in reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;56:102–6. - PubMed
-
- Cicinelli E, Didonna T, Schonauer LM, et al. Paracervical anesthesia for hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:1014–8. - PubMed
-
- Giorda G, Scarabelli C, Franceschi S, Campagnutta E. Feasibility and pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy in post-menopausal women: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:593–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources