Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 22:22:100347.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100347. eCollection 2020 May.

First successful field evaluation of new, one-minute haemozoin-based malaria diagnostic device

Affiliations

First successful field evaluation of new, one-minute haemozoin-based malaria diagnostic device

Rajat Kumar et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Early and accurate diagnosis of malaria is critical to the success of malaria elimination. However, the current mainstay of malaria diagnosis in the field, such as light microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), have limitations due to low parasite density or mutation in diagnostic markers.

Methods: We evaluated an inexpensive, robust, rapid, malaria diagnostic device, called Gazelle, that employs magneto-optical detection to identify haemozoin crystals (Hz) produced by all species of human malaria parasites in infected individuals. A beam of polarised light is passed through the lysed diluted blood sample under the influence of high (~.55T) and low magnetic fields. The difference in light transmission through the sample between the high and low magnetic fields indicates presence of Hz, suggesting possible malarial infection. A total of 300 febrile patients were screened at the malaria clinic of Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (ICMR-NIRTH), Jabalpur, India, from August 2018 to November 2018. Malaria diagnosis was done using four diagnostic methods: Gazelle, light microscopy, RDT, and malaria specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Measures of diagnostic accuracy were compared.

Findings: Out of 300 febrile patients enroled and tested for the presence of malaria parasites, 262 patient samples were included in the final analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of Gazelle was 98% and 97% in comparison to light microscopy, 82% and 99% to PCR and 78% and 99% to RDT, respectively. The results of the four diagnostic methods were comparable and statistically no significant differences in sensitivity or specificity was observed between these methods. Enhanced diagnostic accuracy of Gazelle in malaria patients with no prior history of malaria treatment was observed in this study.

Interpretation: The diagnostic ability of Gazelle was comparable to light microscopy and better than RDTs even in low parasitemia and in presence of pfhrp2/3 deletion mutant parasites. Gazelle may be a novel valuable diagnostic tool in resource poor settings where (i) microscopy is not feasible and (ii) pfhrp2/3gene deleted parasite are present. Its speed, cost-efficiency, and alternative to lack of microscopists makes it an important adjunct in field settings.

Funding: HemexDx, India.

Keywords: Gazelle; Haemozoin; Malaria diagnosis; P. falciparum; Rapid diagnostic test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PKB reports grants and non-financial support from HemexDx, India, during the conduct of the study.PT reports personal fees and other from Hemex Health, outside the submitted work; PT is an employee of Hemex Health.RK, AKV,SS, MPS, SR and AD have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Showing the Gazelle device (1a), testing procedure (1b) and mechanism of haemozoin detection by magneto optical detector (1c).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing diagnostic performance of Gazelle, RDT and PCR against Microscopy as gold standard. b: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing diagnostic performance of Gazelle, RDT and Microscopy against PCR as gold standard.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Venn diagram depicting the result of four different malaria diagnostic test. The overlap result of diagnostic test showed that 41 samples were found to be positive in all four different tests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh N., Singh P.K. Insecticide treated nets for malaria control: challenges and opportunities. Tribal Health Bull. 2013;19:1–9.
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO), World malaria report 2018. who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/275867/9789241565653-eng.pdf [cited 2019 April 14].
    1. Sharma R.K., Thakor H.G., Saha K.B., Sonal G.S., Dhariwal A.C., Singh N. Malaria situation in India with special reference to tribal areas. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141:537. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mukry S.N., Saud M., Sufaida G., Shaikh K., Naz A., Shamsi T.S. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria: comparison of manual and automated diagnostic tests. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2017;2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell D., Fleurent A.E., Hegg M.C., Boomgard J.D., McConnico C.C. Development of new malaria diagnostics: matching performance and need. Malar J. 2016;15:406. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources