Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;45(5):775-787.
doi: 10.1111/coa.13592. Epub 2020 Jul 4.

Identifying non-otologic risk factors for tinnitus: A systematic review

Ann N Deklerck  1 , Jens M Debacker  1 , Hannah Keppler  2   3 , Ingeborg J M Dhooge  1   3
Affiliations

Identifying non-otologic risk factors for tinnitus: A systematic review

Ann N Deklerck et al. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The origin of tinnitus has been attributed to a peripheral auditory lesion, inducing bottom-up changes and resulting in the perception of a "phantom sound." However, non-auditory factors can co-exist as well, and can even lie at the origin of tinnitus development. An increasing body of literature focuses on psychological, (neuro)muscular, cardiovascular and many other influences and their respective associations with tinnitus prevalence.

Objective of review: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive description of these non-otologic risk factors, and to summarise the evidence in literature about their link with tinnitus.

Type of review: A narrative systematic review was conducted, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

Search strategy: The MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for eligible articles, supplemented with manual search methods and grey literature search. Epidemiological studies reporting on the relationship between various non-otologic risk factors and tinnitus were included.

Evaluation method: Quality assessment was performed using the Hoy & Brooks tool.

Results: Fifty-five studies were included. Studies were of variable quality, with poor tinnitus definitions and evaluations or questionable sampling of the study population as main contributing factors for high risk of bias. Multiple associated factors have been identified, including cardiovascular, psychological, neurological, musculoskeletal and dietary factors.

Conclusions: The current literature review identified multiple risk factors that could be of significant importance for tinnitus development, maintenance or aggravation. While causality remains uncertain, this systematic elaboration of possible tinnitus comorbidities/risk factors can help provide direction for future research, and can direct clinicians to identify patients at risk and treat relevant symptoms accordingly.

Keywords: aetiology; diagnosis; epidemiology; pathophysiology; review; therapy; tinnitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Moller A. Introduction. In: Moller A, Langguth B,De Ridder D, Kleinjung T, eds. Textbook of Tinnitus, vol. 1. New York, Dordrechts, Heidelberg, London: Springer; 2011:3-8.
    1. McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, Hall D. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res. 2016;337:70-79.
    1. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27(11):676-682.
    1. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. Tinnitus: animal models and findings in humans. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;361(1):311-336.
    1. Henry JA, Roberts LE, Caspary DM, Theodoroff SM, Salvi RJ. Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(1):5-22. quiz 126.

Publication types