Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020:53:e20190535.
doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0535-2019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

A historical review of the techniques of recovery of parasites for their detection in human stools

Affiliations

A historical review of the techniques of recovery of parasites for their detection in human stools

Felipe Augusto Soares et al. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020.

Abstract

Since the early 20th century, the detection of intestinal parasites has improved with the development of several techniques for parasitic structures recovery and identification, which differ in sensitivity, specificity, practicality, cost, and infrastructure demand. This study aims to review, in chronological order, the stool examination techniques and discuss their advantages, limitations, and perspectives, and to provide professionals and specialists in this field with data that lays a foundation for critical analysis on the use of such procedures. The concentration procedures that constitute the main techniques applied in routine research and in parasitological kits are a) spontaneous sedimentation; b) centrifugation-sedimentation with formalin-ethyl acetate; and c) flotation with zinc sulfate solution. While selecting a technique, one should consider the purpose of its application and the technical-operational, biological, and physicochemical factors inherent in the procedures used in stool processing, which may restrict its use. These intrinsic limitations may have undergone procedural changes driven by scientific and technological development and by development of alternative methods, which now contribute to the improvement of diagnostic accuracy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brooker S, Clements ACA, Bundy DAP. Global Epidemiology, Ecology and Control of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections. Adv Parasitol. 2006;1(62):221–261. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pullan RL, Smith JL, Jasrasaria R, Brooker SJ. Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:37–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. 2006;367(9521):1521–1532. - PubMed
    1. WHO . First WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. WHO; 2010. [2017 Nov 22]. Available from: http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/2010report/en/
    1. Alum A, Rubino JR, Ijaz MK. The global war against intestinal parasites-should we use a holistic approach? Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(9):e732-8. - PubMed

Publication types