Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207445.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7445.

Regional Disparities in Qualified Health Plans' Prior Authorization Requirements for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States

Affiliations

Regional Disparities in Qualified Health Plans' Prior Authorization Requirements for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States

Kathleen A McManus et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: With the goal of ending the HIV epidemic in the United States, access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is essential to help curb new HIV infections. There has been differential uptake of PrEP by region, with the South lagging behind other regions. Discriminatory benefit design (benefit design that prevents or delays people with complex or expensive conditions from obtaining appropriate treatment) through prior authorization requirements could be a systemic barrier that contributes to the decreased PrEP uptake in the South.

Objectives: To investigate whether there are regional disparities in prior authorization requirements for combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine for qualified health plans (QHPs) and to assess whether any QHP characteristics explain the disparities.

Design, setting, and participants: This design was a cross-sectional study of QHPs offered in the 2019 Affordable Care Act Marketplace. The QHPs studied included all Affordable Care Act-compliant individual and small-group market plans in the United States.

Exposures: The primary exposure was the 4 census regions (Northeast, West, Midwest, and South). Additional covariates included other plan characteristics.

Main outcomes and measures: Prior authorization requirement for combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine at the QHP level.

Results: In total, 16 853 QHPs were analyzed (18.2% in the Northeast, 19.5% in the West, 25.0% in the Midwest, and 37.3% in the South). Overall, 18.9% of QHPs required prior authorization for combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. This percentage varied by region, with 2.3%, 6.2%, 13.3%, and 37.3% of plans requiring prior authorization in the Northeast, West, Midwest, and South, respectively. Compared with QHPs in the Northeast, QHPs in the South were 15.89 (95% CI, 12.57-20.09) times as likely to require prior authorization, whereas the Midwest and West were 5.69 (95% CI, 4.45-7.27) and 2.65 (95% CI, 2.02-3.47) times as likely, respectively. Other plan characteristics did not account for the regional variation.

Conclusions and relevance: Compared with QHPs in the Northeast, QHPs in the South were almost 16 times as likely to require prior authorization for PrEP, and the reasons for these disparities are unknown. The prior authorization requirement is a possible barrier to PrEP access in the South, which is the region of the United States with the most annual new HIV diagnoses. There is limited regulation of QHPs' prior authorization requirements. Federal- or state-level health policy laws may be necessary to remove this system-level barrier to ending the HIV epidemic in the United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr McManus reported receiving investigator-initiated research funding from Gilead Sciences, Inc; owning stock in Gilead Sciences, Inc; and receiving grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Ms Killelea reported receiving grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Percentage of Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) That Required Prior Authorization for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in 2019
Of the 16 853 unique Affordable Care Act–compliant plans offered in the individual Affordable Care Act Marketplace during 2019, 18.9% of QHPs required prior authorization for combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (the medication used for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis). This percentage varied by region, with 2.3%, 6.2%, 13.3%, and 37.3% of plans requiring prior authorization in the Northeast, West, Midwest, and South, respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Percentage of Qualified Health Plans That Required Prior Authorization for HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis by Rating Area in 2019
The rate of prior authorization requirement for combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine by unique Affordable Care Act–compliant plans offered in the individual Affordable Care Act Marketplace during 2019 was mapped by rating area.

References

    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. ; iPrEx Study Team . Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587-2599. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1011205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Juusola JL, Brandeau ML, Owens DK, Bendavid E. The cost-effectiveness of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in the United States in men who have sex with men. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(8):541-550. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844-845. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.1343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riddell J IV, Amico KR, Mayer KH. HIV preexposure prophylaxis: a review. JAMA. 2018;319(12):1261-1268. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.1917 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farnham PG, Gopalappa C, Sansom SL, et al. . Updates of lifetime costs of care and quality-of-life estimates for HIV-infected persons in the United States: late versus early diagnosis and entry into care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;64(2):183-189. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182973966 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms