Clinicians' Values and Preferences for Medication Adherence and Cost Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 32492717
- PMCID: PMC7269720
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712467
Clinicians' Values and Preferences for Medication Adherence and Cost Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Background: Medication nonadherence and unaffordability are prevalent, burdensome issues in primary care. In response, technology companies are capitalizing on clinical decision support (CDS) to deliver patient-specific information regarding medication adherence and costs to clinicians using electronic health records (EHRs). To maximize adoption and usability, these CDS tools should be designed with consideration of end users' values and preferences.
Objective: This article evaluates primary care clinicians' values and preferences for a medication adherence and cost CDS.
Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with primary care clinicians with prescribing privileges and EHR access to identify clinicians' perceptions of and approaches to assessing medication adherence and costs, and to determine perceived values and preferences for medication adherence and cost CDS. Interviews were conducted until saturation of responses was reached. ATLAS.ti was used for thematic analysis.
Results: Among 26 clinicians interviewed, themes identified included a high value, but moderate need for a medication adherence CDS and high value and need for cost CDS. Clinicians expressed the cost CDS would provide actionable solutions and greatly impact patient care. Another theme identified was a desire for medication adherence and cost CDS to be separate tools yet integrated into workflow. The majority of clinicians preferred a medication adherence CDS that integrated claims data and actively displayed data using color-coded adherence categories within patients' medication lists in the EHR. For the cost CDS, clinicians preferred medication out-of-pocket costs and a list of cheaper or payor-preferred alternatives to display within the order queue of the EHR.
Conclusion: We identified valuable insights regarding clinician values and preferences for medication adherence and cost CDS. Overall, primary care clinicians feel CDS for medication adherence and cost are valuable and prefer them to be separate. These insights should be used to inform the design, implementation, and EHR integration of future medication and cost CDS tools.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Conflict of interest statement
C.G.D. reports other from Amgen Inc, other from Amarin Corporation, outside the submitted work.
References
-
- Chronic disease overviewCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Published June 28, 2017. Updated June 28, 2017. Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/overview/index.htm. Accessed January 15, 2018
-
- Multiple chronic conditionsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Published February 12, 2015. Updated January 20, 2016. Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/multiple-chronic.htm. Accessed January 15, 2018
-
- Ruzicka M, Hiremath S. Can drugs work in patients who do not take them? The problem of non-adherence in resistant hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(09):579. - PubMed
-
- Wagner T H, Heisler M, Piette J D.Prescription drug co-payments and cost-related medication underuse Health Econ Policy Law 20083(Pt 1):51–67. - PubMed
