Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):702.
doi: 10.3390/plants9060702.

Cellular, Molecular, and Physiological Aspects of In Vitro Plant Regeneration

Affiliations
Review

Cellular, Molecular, and Physiological Aspects of In Vitro Plant Regeneration

Siamak Shirani Bidabadi et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Plants generally have the highest regenerative ability because they show a high degree of developmental plasticity. Although the basic principles of plant regeneration date back many years, understanding the cellular, molecular, and physiological mechanisms based on these principles is currently in progress. In addition to the significant effects of some factors such as medium components, phytohormones, explant type, and light on the regeneration ability of an explant, recent reports evidence the involvement of molecular signals in organogenesis and embryogenesis responses to explant wounding, induced plant cell death, and phytohormones interaction. However, some cellular behaviors such as the occurrence of somaclonal variations and abnormalities during the in vitro plant regeneration process may be associated with adverse effects on the efficacy of plant regeneration. A review of past studies suggests that, in some cases, regeneration in plants involves the reprogramming of distinct somatic cells, while in others, it is induced by the activation of relatively undifferentiated cells in somatic tissues. However, this review covers the most important factors involved in the process of plant regeneration and discusses the mechanisms by which plants monitor this process.

Keywords: abnormalities; in vitro regeneration; micropropagation; organogenesis; somatic embryogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Morphology of different stages during plant organogenesis in Nicotiana rustica. (A) Root regeneration from callus tissue. (B) Shooty callus. (C) Embryo regeneration from callus tissue. (D) Compact callus (E) Shoot regeneration from callus tissue (F) Shoot clumps regenerated from a friable callus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Totipotency and pluripotency in plant regeneration.

References

    1. Haberlandt G. Culturversuehe mit isolierten Pflanzenzellen. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien Math. Naturwiss. 1902;111:69–92.
    1. Feher A. Callus, dedifferentiation, totipotency, somatic embryogenesis: What these terms mean in the era of molecular plant biology? Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10:536. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00536. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thorpe T.A. History of plant tissue culture. Mol. Biotechnol. 2007;37:169–180. doi: 10.1007/s12033-007-0031-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugimoto K., Gordon S.P., Meyerowitz E.M. Regeneration in plants and animals: Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, or just differentiation? Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21:212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pulianmackal A.J., Kareem A.V., Durgaprasad K., Trivedi Z.B., Prasad K. Competence and regulatory interactions during regeneration in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00142. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources