Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Jul;31(7):1628-1639.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019060623. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator (Darbepoetin Alfa) Study of Oral Roxadustat in CKD Patients with Anemia on Hemodialysis in Japan

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator (Darbepoetin Alfa) Study of Oral Roxadustat in CKD Patients with Anemia on Hemodialysis in Japan

Tadao Akizawa et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved in China for dialysis-dependent CKD anemia.

Methods: This phase 3, 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy study evaluated roxadustat's noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa for hemodialysis-dependent CKD anemia. We randomly assigned Japanese patients to oral roxadustat three times weekly or to darbepoetin alfa injections once weekly, titrating doses to maintain hemoglobin between 10-12 g/dl. The primary end point was change of average hemoglobin from baseline to weeks 18-24 (Hb18-24). Secondary end points were average hemoglobin and proportion of patients with hemoglobin between 10-12 g/dl (maintenance rate) at weeks 18-24, and iron parameters. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events and adjudicated ophthalmologic findings.

Results: We randomly assigned 303 patients to roxadustat (n=151) or darbepoetin alfa (n=152). The difference between roxadustat and darbepoetin alfa in Hb18-24 was -0.02 g/dl (95% confidence interval, -0.18 to 0.15), confirming roxadustat's noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa. Average hemoglobin at weeks 18-24 with roxadustat was 10.99 g/dl (95% confidence interval: 10.88 to 11.10), confirming its efficacy. Among patients with one or more hemoglobin value during weeks 18-24, the maintenance rate was 95.2% with roxadustat and 91.3% with darbepoetin alfa. Serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation remained clinically stable with roxadustat; transferrin and total iron binding capacity increased through week 4 before stabilizing. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis, shunt stenosis, diarrhea, contusion, and vomiting. The proportion of patients with new or worsening retinal hemorrhage was 32.4% with roxadustat and 36.6% with darbepoetin alfa. We observed no clinically meaningful changes in retinal thickness groups.

Conclusions: Roxadustat maintained hemoglobin within 10-12 g/dl in patients on hemodialysis and was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with previous reports.

Clinical trial registry name and registration number: A Study of Intermittent Oral Dosing of ASP1517 in Hemodialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Anemia, NCT02952092 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Keywords: anemia; chronic kidney disease; clinical trial; darbepoetin alfa; hemodialysis; roxadustat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Characteristics of patients. For screen failures, “other” generally indicates that a patient was excluded based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. For patients who discontinued after randomization, other refers to cancer (n=1), met withdrawal criteria (n=1), withdrew due to lack of study drug (n=1), and rheumatoid arthritis (n=1) in patients on DA; and met withdrawal criteria (n=2), eye surgery (n=2), and safety (n=1) in patients on roxadustat.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean (SD) Hb levels were comparable between groups throughout the study (FAS). EoT, end of treatment; PSC, prescreening; SC, screening.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean (SD) Hb levels were similar between groups throughout the study when stratified by hs-CRP (FAS). EoT, end of treatment; PSC, prescreening; SC, screening.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Median (interquartile range) allocated dose of study drug per administration required to maintain target Hb levels was similar in the roxadustat group and slightly different in the DA group when stratified by hs-CRP (FAS). DA was IV administered once per week to patients at the completion of dialysis, on the dialysis day after the longest dialysis interval, for a maximum of 24 weeks. The last dose was administered at completion of dialysis on the day of the week 23 visit.

Comment in

  • Role of Roxadustat for ESA-Resistant Renal Anemia? -Read with Caution.
    Tanaka M, Shinohara K, Ono A, Ikuma M. Tanaka M, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2737. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020060821. Epub 2020 Sep 4. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020. PMID: 32897870 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Authors' Reply.
    Akizawa T, Iwasaki M, Yamaguchi Y, Majikawa Y, Reusch M. Akizawa T, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Nov;31(11):2738-2740. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020071096. Epub 2020 Sep 4. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020. PMID: 32915765 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Authors' Reply.
    Akizawa T, Iwasaki M, Yamaguchi Y, Majikawa Y, Reusch M. Akizawa T, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Apr;32(4):1005-1007. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021010051. Epub 2021 Mar 1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 33649099 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Roxadustat for Renal Anemia in ESRD from PKD Patients: Is It Safe Enough?
    Liu F, Wang J, Ye Q, Fu H, Mao J. Liu F, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Apr;32(4):1005. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020111664. Epub 2021 Mar 1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 33649100 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Babitt JL, Lin HY: Mechanisms of anemia in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 1631–1634, 2012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stauffer ME, Fan T: Prevalence of anemia in chronic kidney disease in the United States. PLoS One 9: e84943, 2014. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Vecchio L, Locatelli F: An overview on safety issues related to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the treatment of anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Expert Opin Drug Saf 15: 1021–1030, 2016. - PubMed
    1. Akizawa T, Okumura H, Alexandre AF, Fukushima A, Kiyabu G, Dorey J: Burden of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients in japan: A literature review. Ther Apher Dial 22: 444–456, 2018. - PubMed
    1. Johnson DW, Pollock CA, Macdougall IC: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness. Nephrology (Carlton) 12: 321–330, 2007. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data