Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Apr;105(4):490-495.
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316152. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: an overview of systematic reviews

Manuele Michelessi  1 , Tianjing Li  2 , Alba Miele  3 , Augusto Azuara-Blanco  4 , Riaz Qureshi  5 , Gianni Virgili  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: an overview of systematic reviews

Manuele Michelessi et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the diagnostic accuracy (DTA) of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting glaucoma by systematically searching and appraising systematic reviews (SRs) on this issue.

Methods: We searched a database of SRs in eyes and vision maintained by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision United States on the DTA of OCT for detecting glaucoma. Two authors working independently screened the records, abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews checklist. We extracted quantitative DTA estimates as well as qualitative statements on their relevance to practice.

Results: We included four SRs published between 2015 and 2018. These SRs included between 17 and 113 studies on OCT for glaucoma diagnosis. Two reviews were at low risk of bias and the other two had two to four domains at high or unclear risk of bias with concerns on applicability. The two reliable SRs reported the accuracy of average retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and found a sensitivity of 0.69 (0.63 to 0.73) and 0.78 (0.74 to 0.83) and a specificity of 0.94 (0.93 to 0.95) and 0.93 (0.92 to 0.95) in 57 and 50 studies, respectively. Only one review included a clear specification of the clinical pathway. Both reviews highlighted the limitations of primary DTA studies on this topic.

Conclusions: The quality of published DTA reviews on OCT for diagnosing glaucoma was mixed. Two reliable SRs found moderate sensitivity at high specificity for average RNFL thickness in diagnosing manifest glaucoma. Our overview suggests that the methodological quality of both primary and secondary DTA research on glaucoma is in need of improvement.

Keywords: diagnostic tests/investigation; glaucoma; imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing the identification of systematic reviews of optical coherence tomography (OCT) diagnostic accuracy for detecting glaucoma.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung KR, Kim JS, Wollstein G, et al. Imaging of the retinal nerve fibre layer with spectral domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:909–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oddone F, Lucenteforte E, Michelessi M, et al. Macular versus retinal nerve fiber layer parameters for diagnosing manifest glaucoma: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ophthalmology 2016;123:939–49. - PubMed
    1. Prum BE, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern(®) Guidelines. Ophthalmology 2016;123:P41–111. - PubMed
    1. European Glaucoma Society. European glaucoma Society terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 4th Edn. Br J Ophthalmol, 2017: 1–72. - PubMed

Publication types