Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May-Jun;36(4):668-672.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.4.2031.

qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department

Kavous Shahsavarinia  1 , Payman Moharramzadeh  2 , Reza Jamal Arvanagi  3 , Ata Mahmoodpoor  4
Affiliations

qSOFA score for prediction of sepsis outcome in emergency department

Kavous Shahsavarinia et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2020 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The third international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis 3) task force recently introduced qSOFA (quick sequential organ failure assessment) as a score for detection of patients at risk of sepsis outside of intensive care units. We performed this study to evaluate the validity of qSOFA for early detection and risk stratification of septic patients in emergency department.

Methods: We conducted this study in an emergency department of the largest university affiliated hospital in northwest of Iran from Sept 2015 to Sept 2016. One hundred and forty patients who were SIRS positive with a suspected infection without alternative diagnosis and a microbiological proven infection were enrolled in this study. qSOFA was calculated for each patient and correlated with sepsis grades and mortality.

Results: From 140 patients 84 (60%) had positive qSOFA score and 56 (40%) patients had negative qSOFA score. Our results showed that near half of patients with positive qSOFA expired during their stay in hospital while this was about 5% for patients with negative qSOFA. ROC curve of study regarding prediction of outcome with qSOFA showed an area under curve of 0.59. (P value: 0.04). Time spent to sepsis detection was 16 minutes shorter with qSOFA score compared to SIRS criteria in this study.

Conclusion: In patients with suspected sepsis, qSOFA has acceptable value for risk stratification of severity, multi organ failure and mortality. It seems that education of medical staff and frequent screening of patients for warning signs can help to increase the value of qSOFA in prediction of mortality in critically ill septic patients.

Keywords: Emergency department; Sepsis; qSOFA ((quick sequential organ failure assessment).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Prediction of outcome by qSOFA.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cabrita JA, Pinheiro I, Menezes Falcao L. Rethinking the concept of sepsis and septic shock. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;54:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2018.06.002. - PubMed
    1. Wang HE, Jones AR, Donnelly JP. Revised national estimates of emergency department visits for sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1443–1449. doi:10.1097/CCM. 0000000000002538. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freund Y, Lemachatti N, Krastinova E, Van Laer M, Claessens YE, Avondo A, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department. JAMA. 2017;317:301–308. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.20329. - PubMed
    1. Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, McGloughlin S, MacIsaac C, Bellomo R, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA score for In-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA. 2017;317:290–300. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.20328. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources