Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug 15;9(8):3265-3270.
doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090805. eCollection 2018 Aug.

Minimizing Radiation in the Modern Electrophysiology Laboratory

Affiliations
Review

Minimizing Radiation in the Modern Electrophysiology Laboratory

Albert J Rogers et al. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. .

Abstract

Historically, the electrophysiology laboratory has relied heavily on the use of ionizing radiation in the form of fluoroscopy for a broad range of interventions and diagnostics. As the harmful effects of radiation have become increasingly recognized and procedural technologies have advanced, electrophysiologists have adopted new workflows. The purpose of this article is to review the available literature and experience in minimizing radiation in the modern electrophysiology laboratory. This review first covers general approaches to reducing fluoroscopy radiation in the electrophysiology suite, with concepts that apply across all procedure types. These include the reduction of infrared emission through fastidious fluoroscopy settings, new and proven solutions for radiation shielding, and methods of creating distance between the radiation source and the operator to reduce exposure. Following this discussion, we review specific task-based techniques for reducing radiation during special electrophysiologic procedures and workflows such as vascular access, coronary sinus lead placement, catheter manipulation, and periprocedural planning studies.

Keywords: Ablation; fluoroscopy; laboratory; radiation; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest for the published content.

Comment in

  • Minimizing Radiation-Why Aren't We Down to Zero?
    Sugrue A, Le KY, Dearani P, Asirvatham SJ. Sugrue A, et al. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 Aug 15;9(8):3271-3273. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090807. eCollection 2018 Aug. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018. PMID: 32496483 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Picano E, Santoro G, Vano E. Sustainability in the cardiac cath lab. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007;23(2):143–147. [CrossRef] [PubMed] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klein LW, Miller DL, Balter S, et al. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. J Radiol Nurs. 2010;29(3):75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2010.06.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anselmino M, Sillano D, Casolati D, Ferraris F, Scaglione M, Gaita F. A new electrophysiology era: zero fluoroscopy. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013;14(3):221–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogers DP, England F, Lozhkin K, Lowe MD, Lambiase PD, Chow AW. Improving safety in the electrophysiology laboratory using a simple radiation dose reduction strategy: a study of 1007 radiofrequency ablation procedures. Heart. 2011;97(5):366–370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finkelstein MM. Is brain cancer an occupational disease of cardiologists? Can J Cardiol. 1998;14(11):1385–1388. [PubMed] - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources