Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 12;6(11):638-649.
doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?

Affiliations

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?

Arlene Blum et al. Environ Sci Technol Lett. .

Abstract

As the use of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and the entire class of organohalogen flame retardants, is declining, the use of organophosphate esters flame retardants (OPFRs) is increasing. In this paper, we ask whether OPFRs are a better choice than PBDEs. To address this question, we compared OPFRs with PBDEs for a wide range of properties. OPFRs exposure is ubiquitous in people and in outdoor and indoor environments, and are now often found at higher levels compared to PBDE peak exposure levels. Furthermore, data from toxicity testing, epidemiological studies, and risk assessments all suggest that there are health concerns at current exposure levels for both halogenated and non-halogenated OPFRs. Obtaining the scientific evidence needed for regulation of OPFRs can take many years. Given the large number of OPFRs in use, manufacturers can move towards healthier and safer products by developing innovative ways to reduce fire hazard for electronics enclosures, upholstered furniture, building materials and other consumer products without adding flame retardant chemicals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timeline of major regulatory milestones for PBDEs and OPFRs. Policy enactment dates are listed; implementation/ compliance dates are often later (see Table S1 for detailed information).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Bar chart representing selected median concentrations of total OPFRs and total PBDEs in outdoor air (pg/m3, A), water (ng/L, B), and indoor dust (ng/g, C). Each bar represents data from a different study (see Tables S2–5 for details about the studies included and for a more comprehensive list of locations).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Flame retardant plasma concentrations measured or estimated from ingestion using data from house dust, breastmilk, and/or handwipe samples (colored bars and circles) are compared to the most potent in vitro concentration per chemical (black dots) and in vivo point-of-departure (POD; triangles). The filled triangles represent rat plasma concentrations based on in vivo POD values (when available), and open triangles represent the Minimum Risk Levels (MRLs). The colored bars represent the range of concentrations and the circles represent the mean, median, or maximum median (see Supporting Information for further details on these calculations).

References

    1. Babrauskas V, Ignition handbook: principles and applications to fire safety engineering, fire investigation, risk management and forensic science. Fire Science publishers: 2003.
    1. Babrauskas V; Blum A; Daley R; Birnbaum L, Flame retardants in furniture foam: benefits and risks. Fire Safety Science 10, 265–278.
    1. Stapleton HM; Misenheimer J; Hoffman K; Webster TF, Flame retardant associations between children’s handwipes and house dust. Chemosphere 2014, 116, 54–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mendelsohn E; Hagopian A; Hoffman K; Butt CM; Lorenzo A; Congleton J; Webster TF; Stapleton HM, Nail polish as a source of exposure to triphenyl phosphate. Environ. Int. 2016, 86, 45–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Randy Y Preliminary information on manufacturing, processing, distribution, use, and disposal: phenol, isopropylated, phosphate (3:1); 2017.