Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;44(10):3564-3572.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05619-7.

Transition in Frailty State Among Elderly Patients After Vascular Surgery

Affiliations

Transition in Frailty State Among Elderly Patients After Vascular Surgery

Louise B D Banning et al. World J Surg. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Frailty in the vascular surgical ward is common and predicts poor surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze transitions in frailty state in elderly patients after vascular surgery and to evaluate influence of patient characteristics on this transition.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2018, 310 patients, ≥65 years and scheduled for elective vascular surgery, were included in this cohort study. Transition in frailty state between preoperative and follow-up measurement was determined using the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), a validated tool to measure frailty in vascular surgery patients. Frailty is defined as a GFI score ≥4. Patient characteristics leading to a transition in frailty state were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results: Mean age was 72.7 ± 5.2 years, and 74.5% were male. Mean follow-up time was 22.7 ± 9.5 months. At baseline measurement, 79 patients (25.5%) were considered frail. In total, 64 non-frail patients (20.6%) shifted to frail and 29 frail patients (9.4%) to non-frail. Frail patients with a high Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR = 0.329 (CI: 0.133-0.812), p = 0.016) and that underwent a major vascular intervention (HR = 0.365 (CI: 0.154-0.865), p = 0.022) had a significantly higher risk to remain frail after the intervention.

Conclusions: The results of this study, showing that after vascular surgery almost 21% of the non-frail patients become frail, may lead to a more effective shared decision-making process when considering treatment options, by providing more insight in the postoperative frailty course of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Transition in frailty state percentage of patients that transitioned in frailty state during follow-up (months)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in GFI score, per domain change in Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) score, stratified in patients (%) that transitioned from frail to non-frail (improvement in GFI score) and from non-frail to frail (worsening in GFI score), per domain

References

    1. van Oostrom SH, Picavet HSJ, van Gelder BM, et al. Multimorbidity and comorbidity in the dutch population—data from general practices. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:715. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-715. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Villacampa-Fernández P, Navarro-Pardo E, Tarín JJ, Cano A. Frailty and multimorbidity: two related yet different concepts. Maturitas. 2017;95:31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.10.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aubertin-Leheudre M, Woods AJ, Anton S, et al. Frailty clinical phenotype: a physical and cognitive point of view. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2015;83:55–63. doi: 10.1159/000382061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drudi LM, Ades M, Landry T, et al. Scoping review of frailty in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:1989–1998. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;31:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007. - DOI - PubMed