Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;35(9):2553-2559.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05922-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin

Affiliations

Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin

Emily Nachtigal et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Cancer screening is chiefly performed by primary care providers (PCPs) who rely on organizational screening guidelines. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations; however, they are often without unanimity leading to divergent screening recommendations.

Objective: Due to the high incidence of breast cancer, the availability of screening methods, and the presence of multiple incongruent guideline recommendations, we sought to understand breast cancer screening practices in Wisconsin to identify patterns that would allow us to improve evidence-based screening adherence.

Methods: A 46-question survey on breast cancer screening beliefs and practices for average-risk women was sent to healthcare providers in Wisconsin in 2018, who provided cancer screening services to women. Providers included physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and midwives.

Results: A total of 295 people responded to the survey, for a response rate of 28.6%. Most respondents were physicians (64.1%), followed by NPs (25.7%), PAs (5.3%), and midwives (1.5%). Of physicians, most practiced family medicine (65.3%), followed by internal medicine (25.3%) and gynecology (9.4%). The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) was reported as being "very influential" for 60.5% of providers, followed by the American Cancer Society at 46.8%. For patients 40-49 years old, 75.6% of providers performed clinical breast exams and 58.5% recommended self-breast exams; these numbers increased for women 50+ years old to 78.7% and 61.2%, respectively. Mammography was more likely to be recommended annually for women aged 40-49 rather than biennially by non-physician clinicians compared to physicians (p < .001).

Conclusions: PCPs in Wisconsin continue to overestimate the efficacy of clinical and self-breast exams as well as overuse these in clinical practice. Providers find multiple screening guidelines influential but favor the USPSTF; however, these guidelines are frequently not being followed. Further research needs to be done to investigate the lack of national guideline adherence by providers to improve compliance with evidence-based screening recommendations.

Keywords: Wisconsin; breast cancer; cancer screening; primary care providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Emily Nachtigal has nothing to disclose.

Dr. Noelle LoConte reports grants from Bayer, grants from Celgene, grants from AbbVie, and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work.

Sarah Kerch has nothing to disclose.

Dr. Xiao Zhang has nothing to disclose.

Dr. Amanda Parkes has nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Beliefs of PCPs regarding breast cancer screening effectiveness.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reported influence of breast cancer screening guidelines in clinical practice. USPSTF, United States Preventive Services Task Force; ACS, American Cancer Society; ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; AAFP, American Academy of Family Physicians; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; ACR, American College of Radiology.

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts & Figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018.
    1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):439–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21412. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):244–55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mandelblatt JS, Stout NK, Schechter CB, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL, Krapcho M, et al. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):215–25. Epub 2016/01/12. doi: 10.7326/M15-1536. PubMed PMID: 26756606; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5079106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall IJ, Tangka FKL, Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Graubard BI, Breen N. Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E97. Epub 2018/07/26. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465. PubMed PMID: 30048233; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6093265. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types