Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;25(1):77-85.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03336-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans

Affiliations

Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans

F Baan et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using two commercially available software packages.

Materials and methods: Ten dry human skulls were subjected to structured light scanning, CBCT scanning, and intra-oral scanning. Two commercially available software packages were used to perform fusion of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT scan to create an accurate virtual head model: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™. The structured light scanner was used as a gold standard and was superimposed on the virtual head models, created by IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, using an Iterative Closest Point algorithm. Differences between the positions of the intra-oral scans obtained with the software packages were recorded and expressed in six degrees of freedom as well as the inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient.

Results: The tested software packages, IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, showed a high level of accuracy compared to the gold standard. The accuracy was calculated for all six degrees of freedom. It was noticeable that the accuracy in the cranial/caudal direction was the lowest for IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ in both the maxilla and mandible. The inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient showed a high level of agreement between the observers.

Clinical relevance: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ are reliable software packages providing an accurate fusion of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT. Both software packages can be used as an accurate fusion tool of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT which provides an accurate basis for 3D virtual planning.

Keywords: CAD; Digital imaging/radiology; Oral implants/implantology; Orthodontic(s); Orthognathic surgery; Treatment planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the fusion process in the IPS CaseDesigner®. a Three-dimensional CBCT skull model in the IPS CaseDesigner® software with the left and the right condyle indicated as well as the occlusion plane. b Intra-oral scans of maxilla and mandible. c Cross-sectional view of the 3D CBCT skull model and fused intra-oral scans. d Frontal view of the result of the fusion of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of the fusion process of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT in OrthoAnalyzer™. a Three-dimensional CBCT skull model in OrthoAnalyzer™ with three points on both the maxillary and mandibular teeth. b Intra-oral scans of maxilla and mandible with three points on both the maxillary and mandibular teeth, corresponding with the points shown in 3A. c Cross-sectional view of the 3D CBCT skull model and fused intra-oral scans (shown in green). d Frontal view of the result of the fusion of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overview of the fusion process. (A) Virtual head model made with IPS CaseDesigner®. (B) Structured light scan (gold standard) of a dry humal skull with high detail of the bony structures as well as the teeth. (C) Virtual head model made with OrthoAnalyzer™. (D) Superimposition of the gold standard with the virtual head model created in IPS CaseDesigner® using the forehead, orbital rims, and zygomatic area as reference. (E) Superimposition of the gold standard with the virtual head model created in OrthoAnalyzer™ using the forehead, orbital rims, and zygomatic area as reference. (F) The different positions of the dental arches of IPS CaseDesigner® and the gold standard. Blue and gray: dental arch position of the gold standard, brown and white: position of the dental arches fused using IPS CaseDesigner®. (G) The different positions of the dental arches of OrthoAnalyzer™ and the gold standard. Blue and gray: dental arch position of the gold standard, brown: position of the dental arches fused using IPS CaseDesigner®. (H) Differences of the dental arches expressed in six DOF for IPS CaseDesigner® and the gold standard for both the maxilla and mandible. (I) Differences of the dental arches expressed in six DOF for OrthoAnalyzer™ and the gold standard for both the maxilla and mandible. LR left/right, AP anterior/posterior, CC cranial/caudal

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jheon AH, Oberoi S, Solem RC, Kapila S. Moving towards precision orthodontics: An evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy. Orthod. Craniofacial Res. 2017;20(March):106–113. - PubMed
    1. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Bergé SJ, Soehardi RA, Xi T, de Haan AFJ, Schutyser F, Maal TJJ. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1154–1163. - PubMed
    1. Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, Bell RB, Thygesen T. Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(8):957–965. - PubMed
    1. Weiss R, Read-Fuller A. Cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an evidence-based review. Dent J. 2019;7(2):1–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liebregts J, Xi T, Timmermans M, de Koning M, Bergé S, Hoppenreijs T, Maal T. Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue simulation in bimaxillary osteotomies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(3):329–335. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources