Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;28(9):443-451.
doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01432-y.

Cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to centre-based cardiac rehabilitation

Affiliations
Review

Cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to centre-based cardiac rehabilitation

R W M Brouwers et al. Neth Heart J. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces morbidity and mortality and increases quality of life in cardiac patients. However, CR utilisation rates are low, and targets for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease are not met in the majority of patients, indicating that secondary prevention programmes such as CR leave room for improvement. Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) may resolve several barriers that impede CR utilisation and sustainability of its effects. In CTR, one or more modules of CR are delivered outside the environment of the hospital or CR centre, using monitoring devices and remote communication with patients. Multidisciplinary CTR is a safe and at least equally (cost-)effective alternative to centre-based CR, and is therefore recommended in a recent addendum to the Dutch multidisciplinary CR guidelines. In this article, we describe the background and core components of this addendum on CTR, and discuss its implications for clinical practice and future perspectives.

Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation; Cardiac telerehabilitation; Chronic heart failure; Coronary artery disease; Telemonitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.W.M. Brouwers, H.J. van Exel, J.M.C. van Hal, H.T. Jorstad, E.P. de Kluiver, R.A. Kraaijenhagen, P.M.J.C. Kuijpers, M.R. van der Linde, R.F. Spee, M. Sunamura, N.H.M.K. Uszko-Lencer, T. Vromen, M.E. Wittekoek and H.M.C. Kemps declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Characteristics of cardiac telerehabilitation programmes. (CR cardiac rehabilitation, CV cardiovascular, CTR cardiac telerehabilitation)

References

    1. Committee for Cardiovascular Prevention, Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology, Landelijk Multidisciplinair Overleg Hartrevalidatie. Addendum telerevalidatie in multidisciplinaire richtlijn hartrevalidatie. 2018. https://www.nvvc.nl/Kwaliteit/Richtlijnen/Addendum%20richtlijn%20hartrev.... Accessed 26 Feb 2020.
    1. Anderson L, Thompson DR, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long L, Mordi IR, Bridges C, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1:CD003331. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Vries H, Kemps HM, van Engen-Verheul MM, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in a large representative community cohort of Dutch patients. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1519–1528. - PubMed
    1. Netherlands Society of Cardiology, Netherlands Heart Foundation. Multidisciplinary guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation. 2011. https://www.nvvc.nl/Richtlijnen/Multidisciplinaire%20Richtlijn%20Hartrev.... Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

LinkOut - more resources