Von ‚Fehlanpassungen‘ und ‚metabolischen Ghettos‘: Zur Konzeptualisierung globaler Gesundheitsunterschiede im Feld der Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
- PMID: 32495359
- DOI: 10.1002/bewi.201801902
Von ‚Fehlanpassungen‘ und ‚metabolischen Ghettos‘: Zur Konzeptualisierung globaler Gesundheitsunterschiede im Feld der Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
Abstract
On ‘Mismatch’ and ‘Metabolic Ghettos:’ The Conceptualization of Global Health Differences in Research on the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. Epigenetic approaches to human health have received growing attention in the past two decades. They allow to view the development of human organisms as plastic, i.e. as open to influences from the social and material environment such as nutrition, stress, and trauma. This has lent new credence to approaches in biomedicine that aim to draw attention to the importance of development for later life health. Some scholars in the social sciences and humanities have welcomed such approaches as a departure from gene‐centric perspectives and as an opportunity for highlighting the social and political determinants of health and illness. Others have warned that they might lead to new forms of biological reductionisms and determinisms. In this article, we explore how research on developmental plasticity addresses and articulates global health disparities, specifically in the context of postcolonial India. We discuss two prominent approaches from the field of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) that build on epigenetic perspectives on health and illness and view different global rates of disease susceptibility as the result of developmental processes: first, the ‘mismatch paradigm’ by Peter Gluckman and Mark Hanson and second, the ‘metabolic ghetto’ concept by Jonathan Wells. We highlight how both approaches render historical and social factors meaningful for the development of global health disparities, but emphasize how they at the same time remain prone to determinisms and reductionisms reminiscent of a gene‐centric perspective. DOHaD actors themselves are critical of these tendencies, and in conclusion we explore novel opportunities for interdisciplinary collaborations enabled by this critical potential.
Keywords: Developmental Origins of Health and Disease; Epigenetik; Fehlanpassung; Genetik; Plastizität; Postkolonialismus; epigenetic determinism; epigenetics; epigenetischer Determinismus; genetics; global health disparities; globale Gesundheitsunterschiede; interdisciplinary collaborations; interdisziplinäre Kollaborationen; metabolic ghetto; metabolisches Ghetto; mismatch; plasticity; postcolonialism.
References
-
- Martyn Pickersgill, Jörg Niewöhner, Ruth Müller, Paul Martin, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Mapping the New Molecular Landscape: Social Dimensions of Epigenetics, New Genetics and Society 32 (2013), 429–447; Hannah Landecker, Aaron Panofsky, From Social Structure to Gene Regulation, and: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Epigenetics for Sociology, Annual Review of Sociology 39 (2013), 333–357; Vanessa Lux, Kulturen der Epigenetik, in: Jörg Walter, Anja Hümpel (Hrsgg.), Epigenetik. Implikationen für die Lebens- und Geisteswissenschaften, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2017, S. 135–158.
-
- David Allis, Thomas Jenuwein, The Molecular Hallmarks of Epigenetic Control, Nature Review Genetics 17 (2016), 487–500.
-
- Eine Geschichtsschreibung der Epigenetik liegt bislang nur ansatzweise vor. In einem ersten Abriss verweist Tatjana Buklijas darauf, dass bisherige historische Erzählungen nur aus Teilnehmerperspektive geschrieben worden seien und sich dabei an divergierenden Verständnissen der Epigenetik orientiert hätten: Während „Konformisten“ die Epigenetik innerhalb eines klassischen genetischen Verständnisses verorten und damit die Entstehung epigenetischer Forschung als Unterbereich der Genetik in den 1970er Jahren ansiedeln, würden „Dissidenten“ diese als Teil einer bis ins 19. Jahrhundert zurückreichenden Geschichte alternativer Verständnisse von Vererbungsprozessen verstehen. Siehe Tatjana Buklijas, Histories and Meanings of Epigenetics, in: Maurizio Meloni, John Cromby, Des Fitzgerald, Stephanie Lloyd (Hrsgg.), The Palgrave Handbook of Biology and Society, London: Palgrave 2018, S. 167–187.
-
- Robert Feil, Mario Fraga, Epigenetics and the Environment: Emerging Patterns and Implications, Nature Review Genetics 13 (2012), 97–109. Die Trennung in ‚soziale‘ und ‚materielle‘ Faktoren dient hier nur heuristischen Gründen, da ‚soziale‘ und ‚materielle‘ Aspekte in letzter Konsequenz nicht voneinander trennbar sind.
-
- Mark Hanson, Michael K. Skinner, Developmental Origins of Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance, Environmental Epigenetics 2 (2016), dvw002.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
