Personalised dosing of vancomycin: A prospective and retrospective comparative quasi-experimental study
- PMID: 32495366
- DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14411
Personalised dosing of vancomycin: A prospective and retrospective comparative quasi-experimental study
Abstract
Aims: The 2019 update to the US consensus guideline for vancomycin therapeutic monitoring advocates using Bayesian-guided personalised dosing to maximise efficacy and minimise toxicity of vancomycin. We conducted an observational cohort study of the implementation of bed-side Bayesian-guided vancomycin dosing in vascular surgery patients.
Methods: Over a 9-month prospective study period, vascular surgery patients were dosed vancomycin using Bayesian-guided dosing decision tool (DoseMeRx) and compared retrospectively with a control group admitted to the same ward in the 14 months prior to the study and dosed using a standard algorithmic approach. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving mean area under the curve in 24 hours (AUC24 ) in the acceptable range 350-450 mg/L• h and percentage time in acceptable range (%TTR). Secondary endpoints focused on clinical outcomes including incidence of acute kidney injury.
Results: A significantly higher proportion of DoseMeRx patients achieved mean AUC24 values in the acceptable range compared to the control group; 71/104 (68.3%) vs 58/139 (41.7%), P < .005. The median %TTR was also greater in DoseMeRx patients compared to the control group (57.1 vs 30.0%, P < .00001). Patients in the DoseMeRx group missed an average of 0.23 doses per course compared to 1.04 doses in the control group (P < .00001). No difference was observed in secondary (clinical) outcomes between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Bedside Bayesian-guided personalised dosing of vancomycin increases the proportion of patients achieving target AUC24 and the %TTR.
Keywords: pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; vancomycin.
© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.
Comment in
-
Software to predict the right dose for vancomycin in a clinical environment-A commentary on: Personalised dosing of vancomycin: A prospective and retrospective comparative quasi-experimental study by Luqman Vali et al.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;87(9):3481-3482. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14765. Epub 2021 Feb 27. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 33638868 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Rybak MJ, Lomaestro BM, Rotschafer JC, et al. Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommendations from the infectious diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(3):325-327.
-
- Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin: A revised consensus guideline and review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists 2019 (draft guidelines available at: https://www.ashp.org/-/media/assets/policy-guidelines/docs/draft-guideli...).
-
- Men P, Li HB, Zhai SD, Zhao RS. Association between the AUC0-24/MIC ratio of vancomycin and its clinical effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):1-11, e0146224.
-
- Holmes NE, Turnidge JD, Munckhof WJ, et al. Vancomycin AUC/MIC ratio and 30-day mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(4):1654-1663.
-
- Moise-Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(13):925-942.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous