Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;7(7):1132-1140.
doi: 10.1002/acn3.51076. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

Utility of metabolic screening in neurological presentations of infancy

Affiliations

Utility of metabolic screening in neurological presentations of infancy

Djurdja Djordjevic et al. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The first-line use of specialized metabolic screening laboratories in the investigation of hypotonia and/or developmental delay remains a standard practice despite lack of supporting evidence. Our study aimed to address the utility of such testing by determining the proportion of patients whose diagnosis was directly supported by metabolic screening.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review study of 164 patients under age one who had screening metabolic laboratory testing done within the time period of one calendar year.

Results: Of patients screened, 9/164 (5.5%) had diagnoses supported by metabolic testing (two with nonketotic hyperglycinemia, three with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, one with propionic acidemia, one with a congenital disorder of glycosylation, one with D-bifunctional protein deficiency, and one with GM1 Gangliosidosis). Of patients specifically evaluated for hypotonia and/or developmental delay, 5/79 (6.3%) were diagnosed with the aid of metabolic testing. All patients with positive screens presented with acute decompensation. Outside of this subgroup of high-risk patients, no patients were diagnosed using metabolic testing. Screening laboratories were also ineffective in an outpatient setting, identifying only one of the seven outpatients who was ultimately diagnosed with an inborn error of metabolism.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the yield of specialized metabolic screening testing is extremely low in infants with hypotonia and/or developmental delay, approaching zero outside of the specific setting of clinical decompensation or multi-system involvement. Furthermore, many outpatient cases of IEM are not identified by screening studies. This information will help guide the diagnostic evaluation of hypotonia and/or global developmental delay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have conflicts of interest that are relevant to the manuscript and data contained therein.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Metabolic screening for neurologic indications in infants. Flow chart of the data presented in the manuscript. This retrospective study included all cases of infants <1 year of age in 2017 who had metabolic screening laboratory studies performed at Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. 324 unique cases were represented in this cohort. A total of 164 screens were performed where the primary test indication was neurologic, including hypotonia, global developmental delay, seizures, movement disorder, and stroke. In 9/164 cases overall (5.5%), metabolic screening was positive and guided diagnosis. Cases were further subdivided by whether they were sent from the inpatient (111) or outpatient (53) setting, and for the specific indication of hypotonia and/or global developmental delay. In all settings, the percentage of positive tests was extremely low. (yield = percentage of positive screens/total patients where screening metabolic studies were performed).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peredo DE, Hannibal MC. The floppy infant: evaluation of hypotonia. Pediatr Rev 2019;30:e66–e76. - PubMed
    1. Erika J, García‐Cazorla À, Colomer J, et al. Hypotonia in the neonatal period: 12 years’ experience. Rev Neurol 2013:56(2):72–78. - PubMed
    1. Laugel V, Cossée M, Matis J, et al. Diagnostic approach to neonatal hypotonia: retrospective study on 144 neonates. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167(5):517–523. - PubMed
    1. Paro‐Panjan D, Neubauer D. Congenital hypotonia: is there an algorithm? J Child Neurol 2004;19(6):439–442. - PubMed
    1. Prasad AN, Prasad C. Genetic evaluation of the floppy infant. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;16:99–108. - PubMed