Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;12(3):931-937.
doi: 10.1111/os.12700. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Morphometric Trajectory Analysis for Occipital Condyle Screws

Affiliations

Morphometric Trajectory Analysis for Occipital Condyle Screws

Yu-Kun Du et al. Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: Occipitocervical fusion (OCF) is an effective treatment for instability of occipitocervical junction (OCJ). The occipital condyle screw serves as a novel surgical technique for occipitocervical fixation. However, the intraoperative procedures for the occipital condyle screw technique have relied on surgeons' experience, so the pool of surgeons who are able to perform this surgery safely is limited. The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the occipital condyle screw technique using human cadavers and to provide image anatomy for clinical application basis.

Methods: The scientific study comprised 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens from the anatomy department of Qingdao University. Placement of the occipital condyle screws (3.5 mm diameter and 20.0 mm length) was performed in the 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens with intact occipitocervical junctions, respectively. Occipitocervical CT was performed for all specimens and the DICOM data was obtained. Occipitocervical CT three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was performed for the cadavers. Morphometric analysis was performed on the bilateral occipitocervical junction of 10 cadaveric specimens based on the 3D reconstruction CT images. Detailed morphometric measurements of the 20 occipital condyles screws were conducted including the average length of the screw trajectory, inside and upper tilting angles of screws, distance to the hypoglossal canal, and to the medial wall of occipital condyle.

Results: Placement of the occipital condyle screws into the 20 occipital condyles of the 10 cadaveric specimens was performed successfully and the trajectory of implantation was satisfactory according to 3D CT reconstruction images, respectively. There was no obvious injury to the spinal cord, nerve root, and vertebral artery. The length of the bilateral screw trajectory was, respectively, 20.96 ± 0.91 mm (left) and 20.59 ± 0.77 mm (right) (t = 1.306, P > 0.05). The upper tilting angle of bilateral screws was, respectively, 11.24° ± 0.74° (left) and 11.11° ± 0.64° (right) (t = 0.681, P > 0.05). The inside tilting angle of bilateral screws was, respectively, 31.00° ± 1.32° (left) and 30.85° ± 1.27° (right) (t = 0.307, P > 0.05). The screw's distance to the bilateral hypoglossal canal was, respectively, 4.84 ± 0.54 mm (left) and 4.70 ± 0.54 mm (right) (t = 0.685, P > 0.05). The screw's distance to the medial wall of the bilateral occipital condyle was, respectively, 5.13 ± 0.77 mm (left) and 5.04 ± 0.71 mm (right) (t = 0.384, P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The occipital condyle screw technique can serve as a feasible and safe treatment for instability of the occipitocervical junction with meticulous preoperative planning of the screw entry point and direction based on individual differences. Morphometric trajectory analysis is also an effective way to evaluate the surgical procedure.

Keywords: Morphometric trajectory analysis; Occipital condyle screw; Occipitocervical fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The measurements of (A) the length of screw trajectory (LST), (B) the inside tilting angle (ITA), (C) the distance to the medial wall of the OC (DMWOC), (D) the distance to hypoglossal canal (DHC) (D), and (E) the upper tilting angle (UTA). CT images show the different parameters for screw insertion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Graphs show that there is no significantly bilateral difference of the LST (middle), UTA (top left), ITA (top right), DHC (bottom left), and DMWOC (bottom right).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roberts DA, Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH. Quantitative anatomy of the occiput and the biomechanics of occipital screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998, 23: 1100–1107 discussion 1107–1108. - PubMed
    1. Kalthur SG, Padmashali S, Gupta C, Dsouza AS. Anatomic study of the occipital condyle and its surgical implications in transcondylar approach. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, 2014, 5: 71–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karasu A, Cansever T, Batay F, Sabanci PA, Al‐Mefty O. The microsurgical anatomy of the hypoglossal canal. Surg Radiol Anat, 2009, 31: 363–367. - PubMed
    1. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Biyani A, Brown JA, Yeasting RA. An anatomic study of the thickness of the occipital bone. Implications for occipitocervical instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21: 1725–1729. - PubMed
    1. Zipnick RI, Merola AA, Gorup J, et al Occipital morphology. An anatomic guide to internal fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21: 1719–1724. - PubMed