Morphometric Trajectory Analysis for Occipital Condyle Screws
- PMID: 32495510
- PMCID: PMC7307246
- DOI: 10.1111/os.12700
Morphometric Trajectory Analysis for Occipital Condyle Screws
Abstract
Objectives: Occipitocervical fusion (OCF) is an effective treatment for instability of occipitocervical junction (OCJ). The occipital condyle screw serves as a novel surgical technique for occipitocervical fixation. However, the intraoperative procedures for the occipital condyle screw technique have relied on surgeons' experience, so the pool of surgeons who are able to perform this surgery safely is limited. The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the occipital condyle screw technique using human cadavers and to provide image anatomy for clinical application basis.
Methods: The scientific study comprised 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens from the anatomy department of Qingdao University. Placement of the occipital condyle screws (3.5 mm diameter and 20.0 mm length) was performed in the 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens with intact occipitocervical junctions, respectively. Occipitocervical CT was performed for all specimens and the DICOM data was obtained. Occipitocervical CT three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was performed for the cadavers. Morphometric analysis was performed on the bilateral occipitocervical junction of 10 cadaveric specimens based on the 3D reconstruction CT images. Detailed morphometric measurements of the 20 occipital condyles screws were conducted including the average length of the screw trajectory, inside and upper tilting angles of screws, distance to the hypoglossal canal, and to the medial wall of occipital condyle.
Results: Placement of the occipital condyle screws into the 20 occipital condyles of the 10 cadaveric specimens was performed successfully and the trajectory of implantation was satisfactory according to 3D CT reconstruction images, respectively. There was no obvious injury to the spinal cord, nerve root, and vertebral artery. The length of the bilateral screw trajectory was, respectively, 20.96 ± 0.91 mm (left) and 20.59 ± 0.77 mm (right) (t = 1.306, P > 0.05). The upper tilting angle of bilateral screws was, respectively, 11.24° ± 0.74° (left) and 11.11° ± 0.64° (right) (t = 0.681, P > 0.05). The inside tilting angle of bilateral screws was, respectively, 31.00° ± 1.32° (left) and 30.85° ± 1.27° (right) (t = 0.307, P > 0.05). The screw's distance to the bilateral hypoglossal canal was, respectively, 4.84 ± 0.54 mm (left) and 4.70 ± 0.54 mm (right) (t = 0.685, P > 0.05). The screw's distance to the medial wall of the bilateral occipital condyle was, respectively, 5.13 ± 0.77 mm (left) and 5.04 ± 0.71 mm (right) (t = 0.384, P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The occipital condyle screw technique can serve as a feasible and safe treatment for instability of the occipitocervical junction with meticulous preoperative planning of the screw entry point and direction based on individual differences. Morphometric trajectory analysis is also an effective way to evaluate the surgical procedure.
Keywords: Morphometric trajectory analysis; Occipital condyle screw; Occipitocervical fusion.
© 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Figures


Similar articles
-
[Digital and anatomical study of posterior atlantooccipital joint-occipital condyle-clivus screw technique].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 6;101(25):1973-1977. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201116-03106. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 34225418 Chinese.
-
CT-based morphometric analysis of the occipital condyle: focus on occipital condyle screw insertion.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):572-579. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.SPINE151431. Epub 2016 Jun 24. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27341056
-
Posterior occipitocervical (C0-3) fusion using polyaxial occipital condyle to cervical spine screw and rod fixation: a radiographic and cadaveric analysis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 May;12(5):509-16. doi: 10.3171/2009.11.SPINE09172. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010. PMID: 20433299
-
Occipitocervical Fusion: An Updated Review.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2019;125:247-252. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_35. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2019. PMID: 30610329 Review.
-
Occipital condyle screws: indications and technique.J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):156-163. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.03.01. J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32309654 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Retropharyngeal Reduction Plate for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Cadaveric Test and Morphometric Trajectory Analysis.Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar;14(3):522-529. doi: 10.1111/os.13217. Epub 2022 Jan 30. Orthop Surg. 2022. PMID: 35098677 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal trajectory for the anterior occipital condyle screw.J Int Med Res. 2025 Mar;53(3):3000605251325677. doi: 10.1177/03000605251325677. Epub 2025 Mar 12. J Int Med Res. 2025. PMID: 40073407 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Roberts DA, Doherty BJ, Heggeness MH. Quantitative anatomy of the occiput and the biomechanics of occipital screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998, 23: 1100–1107 discussion 1107–1108. - PubMed
-
- Karasu A, Cansever T, Batay F, Sabanci PA, Al‐Mefty O. The microsurgical anatomy of the hypoglossal canal. Surg Radiol Anat, 2009, 31: 363–367. - PubMed
-
- Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Biyani A, Brown JA, Yeasting RA. An anatomic study of the thickness of the occipital bone. Implications for occipitocervical instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21: 1725–1729. - PubMed
-
- Zipnick RI, Merola AA, Gorup J, et al Occipital morphology. An anatomic guide to internal fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21: 1719–1724. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical