Maxillary implant overdenture retained by four unsplinted attachments and opposed by a natural or fixed dentition: One-year clinical outcomes
- PMID: 32497274
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13623
Maxillary implant overdenture retained by four unsplinted attachments and opposed by a natural or fixed dentition: One-year clinical outcomes
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the implant, prosthesis, and patient-reported outcomes of maxillary removable prostheses retained by 4 implant-supported study abutments after a follow-up period of 1 year in patients with natural teeth or a fixed rehabilitation in the mandible.
Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients were included, and all received 4 implants in the upper maxilla. After 12 weeks, the prostheses were connected to the implant with unsplinted attachments. The implant and prosthodontics outcomes were assessed over a follow-up period of 1 year. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated with the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) questionnaire and an adaptation of the McGill Denture Satisfaction Instrument using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: A single patient dropped out. At the post-operative 12-week follow-up, 79.3% (95% CI: 64.6%-94.1%) of the patients displayed peri-implant mucosa hyperplasia and 69.0% (95% CI: 52.1%-85.8%) showed pain. After 1 year, 16 implants failed in 10 patients, leading to an implant survival rate of 86.2% (95% CI: 79.0%-92.5%), and the mean peri-implant bone loss was 1.01 ± 0.77 mm (95% CI: 0.85-1.16 mm). The prosthesis survival rate was 96.6% (95% CI: 82.2%-99.9%). The OHIP-20 and VAS scores both improved significantly from baseline to 1 year (p < .001).
Conclusion: The implant survival rate was lower compared to the literature for the upper maxilla. Despite the encountered problems, PROMs showed significant improvement with the implant overdenture retained by 4 unsplinted implants compared to conventional dentures.
Keywords: Locator®; dental implants; dental prosthesis; edentulous maxilla; implant overdenture study abutment; overdentures; patient satisfaction; quality of life.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Maxillary implant overdenture retained by four unsplinted attachments and opposed by a natural or fixed dentition: Five-year clinical outcomes. A prospective case series.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Apr;34(4):285-296. doi: 10.1111/clr.14033. Epub 2023 Feb 20. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023. PMID: 36692949
-
Retrospective cohort analysis of maxillary overdentures retained by unsplinted implants.J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Sep;122(3):301-308.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.014. Epub 2019 Apr 1. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. PMID: 30948296
-
Stud vs Bar Attachments for Maxillary Four-Implant-Supported Overdentures: 3- to 9-year Results from a Retrospective Study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):936–946. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7224. Epub 2019 Apr 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019. PMID: 30934037
-
Splinting vs Not Splinting Four Implants Supporting a Maxillary Overdenture: A Systematic Review.Int J Prosthodont. 2019 Nov/Dec;32(6):509-518. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6333. Int J Prosthodont. 2019. PMID: 31664267
-
A systematic review of studies comparing conventional complete denture and implant retained overdenture.J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jan;62(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 27. J Prosthodont Res. 2018. PMID: 28666845
Cited by
-
Risk factors for implant-supported overdenture failures: A systematic review.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Apr 1;24(2):109-121. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_18_24. Epub 2024 Apr 23. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024. PMID: 40654069 Free PMC article.
-
Fully digital versus conventional workflow: Are removable complete overdentures equally good? A randomized crossover trial.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13398. doi: 10.1111/cid.13398. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39350584 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Implant-Supported Overdentures: Current Status and Preclinical Testing of a Novel Attachment System.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 28;12(3):1012. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031012. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36769661 Free PMC article.
-
The performance of two-implant overdentures in the atrophic maxilla: a case series with 1-year follow-up.Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Dec 9;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00460-0. Int J Implant Dent. 2022. PMID: 36484878 Free PMC article.
-
Maxillary overdenture on three implants retained by low-profile stud attachments - A prospective cohort study.J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Nov;49(11):1069-1079. doi: 10.1111/joor.13364. Epub 2022 Sep 7. J Oral Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 36029151 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abu Hantash, R. O., Al-Omiri, M. K., & Al-Wahadni, A. M. (2006). Psychological impact on implant patients' oral health-related quality of life. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17(2), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01219.x
-
- Allen, F., & Locker, D. (2002). A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 15(5), 446-450.
-
- Al-Zubeidi, M. I., Alsabeeha, N. H., Thomson, W. M., & Payne, A. G. (2012). Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14(Suppl 1), e11-e19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00332.x
-
- Anadioti, E., Gates, W. D. 3rd, Elpers, J., De Kok, I. J., & Cooper, L. F. (2019). Retrospective cohort analysis of maxillary overdentures retained by unsplinted implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(3), 301-308.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.014
-
- Andreiotelli, M., Att, W., & Strub, J. R. (2010). Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: A systematic literature review. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 23(3), 195-203.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources