Maxillary implant overdenture retained by four unsplinted attachments and opposed by a natural or fixed dentition: One-year clinical outcomes
- PMID: 32497274
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.13623
Maxillary implant overdenture retained by four unsplinted attachments and opposed by a natural or fixed dentition: One-year clinical outcomes
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the implant, prosthesis, and patient-reported outcomes of maxillary removable prostheses retained by 4 implant-supported study abutments after a follow-up period of 1 year in patients with natural teeth or a fixed rehabilitation in the mandible.
Materials and methods: A total of 30 patients were included, and all received 4 implants in the upper maxilla. After 12 weeks, the prostheses were connected to the implant with unsplinted attachments. The implant and prosthodontics outcomes were assessed over a follow-up period of 1 year. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated with the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) questionnaire and an adaptation of the McGill Denture Satisfaction Instrument using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: A single patient dropped out. At the post-operative 12-week follow-up, 79.3% (95% CI: 64.6%-94.1%) of the patients displayed peri-implant mucosa hyperplasia and 69.0% (95% CI: 52.1%-85.8%) showed pain. After 1 year, 16 implants failed in 10 patients, leading to an implant survival rate of 86.2% (95% CI: 79.0%-92.5%), and the mean peri-implant bone loss was 1.01 ± 0.77 mm (95% CI: 0.85-1.16 mm). The prosthesis survival rate was 96.6% (95% CI: 82.2%-99.9%). The OHIP-20 and VAS scores both improved significantly from baseline to 1 year (p < .001).
Conclusion: The implant survival rate was lower compared to the literature for the upper maxilla. Despite the encountered problems, PROMs showed significant improvement with the implant overdenture retained by 4 unsplinted implants compared to conventional dentures.
Keywords: Locator®; dental implants; dental prosthesis; edentulous maxilla; implant overdenture study abutment; overdentures; patient satisfaction; quality of life.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abu Hantash, R. O., Al-Omiri, M. K., & Al-Wahadni, A. M. (2006). Psychological impact on implant patients' oral health-related quality of life. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17(2), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01219.x
-
- Allen, F., & Locker, D. (2002). A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 15(5), 446-450.
-
- Al-Zubeidi, M. I., Alsabeeha, N. H., Thomson, W. M., & Payne, A. G. (2012). Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14(Suppl 1), e11-e19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00332.x
-
- Anadioti, E., Gates, W. D. 3rd, Elpers, J., De Kok, I. J., & Cooper, L. F. (2019). Retrospective cohort analysis of maxillary overdentures retained by unsplinted implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(3), 301-308.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.014
-
- Andreiotelli, M., Att, W., & Strub, J. R. (2010). Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: A systematic literature review. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 23(3), 195-203.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
