Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 2;10(6):365.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10060365.

Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review

Harish Patel et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is increasing. The increase in suspicion for VTE has lowered the threshold for performing imaging studies to confirm diagnosis of VTE. However, only 20% of suspected cases have a confirmed diagnosis of VTE. Development of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) and update in pre-test probability have changed the paradigm of ruling-out patient with low index of suspicion. The D-dimer test in conjunction to the pre-test probability has been utilized in VTE diagnosis. The age appropriate D-dimer cutoff and inclusion of YEARS algorithm (signs of the DVT, hemoptysis and whether PE is the likely diagnosis) for the D-dimer cutoff have been recent updates in the evaluation of suspected PE. Multi-detector computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and compression ultrasound (CUS) are the preferred imaging modality to diagnose PE and DVT respectively. The VTE diagnostic algorithm do differ in pregnant individuals. The prerequisite of avoiding excessive radiation has recruited planar ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan as preferred in pregnant patients to evaluate for PE. The modification of CUS protocol with addition of the Valsalva maneuver should be performed while evaluating DVT in pregnant individual.

Keywords: VTE diagnosis; pregnancy and VTE; review VTE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagnostic algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism in a non-pregnant patient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagnostic algorithm for the acute DVT in non-pregnant patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic algorithm for evaluation of suspected PE during pregnancy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diagnostic algorithm for evaluation of suspected DVT during pregnancy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson F.A., Jr., Wheeler H.B., Goldberg R.J., Hosmer D.W., Patwardhan N.A., Jovanovic B., Forcier A., Dalen J.E. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch. Intern. Med. 1991;151:933–938. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400050081016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silverstein M.D., Heit J.A., Mohr D.N., Petterson T.M., O’Fallon W.M., Melton L.J., 3rd Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A 25-year population-based study. Arch. Intern. Med. 1998;158:585–593. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.585. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naess I.A., Christiansen S.C., Romundstad P., Cannegieter S.C., Rosendaal F.R., Hammerstrom J. Incidence and mortality of venous thrombosis: A population-based study. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007;5:692–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02450.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beckman M.G. Venous Thromboembolism. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2010;38:S495–S501. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heit J.A. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2015;12:464–474. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.83. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources