Covid conspiracies: misleading evidence can be more damaging than no evidence at all
- PMID: 32498747
- PMCID: PMC7298093
- DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720002184
Covid conspiracies: misleading evidence can be more damaging than no evidence at all
Comment in
-
We should beware of ignoring uncomfortable possible truths (a reply to McManus et al).Psychol Med. 2022 Feb;52(3):599. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720002196. Epub 2020 Jun 8. Psychol Med. 2022. PMID: 32507116 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Hibbing, H. V., Cawvey, M., Deol, R., Bloeser, A. J., & Mondak, J. J. (2019). The relationship between personality and response patterns on public opinion surveys: the big five, extreme response style, and acquiescence response style. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(1), 161–177.
-
- Newsweek (2020) One fifth of English people in study blame Jews or Muslims for COVID-19. Available at https://www.newsweek.com/covid-19-conspiracy-theories-england-1505899.
-
- Opinium (2020). Available at https://www.opinium.co.uk/public-opinion-on-coronavirus-7th-april/.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical