Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 32499076
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.010
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery disease is still controversial. This is systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) for LM disease.
Methods: Online electronic databases were systematically reviewed until January 2020 for randomized trials comparing PCI with drug-eluting stents and CABG. Primary outcomes were: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeated revascularization. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural and nonperiprocedural MI. The period of follow-up included 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated with a fixed-effects model.
Results: A total of 4595 patients (5 randomized trials) with left main coronary artery disease were included. At 30 days and 1 year, PCI was associated with lower incidence of stroke, higher repeated revascularization, and similar odds of mortality and MI compared with CABG. At 5 years, PCI was associated with higher rates of MI (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.79; P = .003) and repeat revascularization (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.58-2.26; P < .001) than CABG. PCI was associated with lower periprocedural MI at 30 days, whereas at 5 years PCI was associated with higher nonperiprocedural MI (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-3.31; P < .001). Mortality and stroke rate did not differ at 5-year follow-up.
Conclusions: Patients with left main coronary artery disease treated with either PCI or CABG do not show significant difference in early or 5-year mortality. Although CABG was associated with higher stroke rates at 30 days and 1 year, PCI was associated with an increase in MI and need for repeat revascularization at 5 years.
Keywords: cardiac surgery; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; drug-eluting stent; left main coronary disease; percutaneous coronary intervention.
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Does a meta-analysis of controversial trials yield controversial results?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):106-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.052. Epub 2020 Apr 23. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 32690408 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30025574
-
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 6. Int J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28438354
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895. JAMA Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28903139 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 28007199
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis.Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2247-2257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 34793745 Review.
Cited by
-
[Clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervention on the unprotected left main coronary artery].Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jan 8;62(1):1-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10278143. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024. PMID: 39110910 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Unfathomed Nanomessages to the Heart: Translational Implications of Stem Cell-Derived, Progenitor Cell Exosomes in Cardiac Repair and Regeneration.Cells. 2021 Jul 17;10(7):1811. doi: 10.3390/cells10071811. Cells. 2021. PMID: 34359980 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The efficacy of phase I cardiac rehabilitation training based on augmented reality on the self-efficacy of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized clinical trial.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 17;15(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00770-9. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 37978403 Free PMC article.
-
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review of Diagnosis and Management.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 18;25(2):66. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2502066. eCollection 2024 Feb. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39077332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Nov 5;15(11):e48297. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48297. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38058336 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous