Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):957-963.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.13781119. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

Dialysis Regret: Prevalence and Correlates

Affiliations

Dialysis Regret: Prevalence and Correlates

Fahad Saeed et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Although some patients regret the decision to start dialysis, modifiable factors associated with regret have rarely been studied. We aimed to identify factors associated with patients' regret to initiate dialysis.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A 41-item questionnaire was administered to adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis in seven dialysis units located in Cleveland, Ohio, and its suburbs. Of the 450 patients asked to participate in the study, 423 agreed and 397 provided data on decisional regret. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of regret, which was assessed using a single item, "Do you regret your decision to start dialysis?" We report adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the following candidate predictors: knowledge of CKD, attitudes toward CKD treatment, and preference for end-of-life care.

Results: Eighty-two of 397 respondents (21%) reported decisional regret. There were no significant demographic correlates of regret. Regret was more common when patients reported choosing dialysis to please doctors or family members (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.31; P<0.001). Patients who reported having a prognostic discussion about life expectancy with their doctors (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.98; P=0.03) and those who had completed a living will (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.95; P=0.03) were less likely to report regret with dialysis initiation.

Conclusions: Dialysis regret was common in this sample. Demographic factors (age, sex, marital status, race, or educational attainment) were not significantly associated with regret, but modifiable care processes were.

Podcast: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_06_09_CJN13781119.mp3.

Keywords: aged; attitude; decision making; decisional regret; emotions; life expectancy; living wills; logistic models; marital status; odds ratio; prognosis; regret; renal dialysis; renal insufficiency, chronic; shared dialysis decision-making; surveys and questionnaires; terminal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract

References

    1. Davison SN: End-of-life care preferences and needs: Perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 195–204, 2010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saeed F, Sardar MA, Davison SN, Murad H, Duberstein PR, Quill TE: Patients’ perspectives on dialysis decision-making and end-of-life care. Clin Nephrol 91: 294–300, 2019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeelenberg M, Pieters R: A theory of regret regulation 1.0. J Consum Psychol 17: 3–18, 2007 - PubMed
    1. Elwyn G, Miron-Shatz T: Deliberation before determination: The definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expect 13: 139–147, 2010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Svenson O: Differentiationand consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre-and post- decision processes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 80: 143–168, 1992

Publication types

MeSH terms