Mortality inequalities by occupational status and type of job in men and women: results from the Rome Longitudinal Study
- PMID: 32499259
- PMCID: PMC7282329
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033776
Mortality inequalities by occupational status and type of job in men and women: results from the Rome Longitudinal Study
Abstract
Objectives: Socioeconomic inequalities have a strong impact on population health all over the world. Occupational status is a powerful determinant of health in rich societies. We aimed at investigating the association between occupation and mortality in a large metropolitan study.
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: Rome, capital of Italy.
Participants: We used the Rome Longitudinal Study, the administrative cohort of residents in Rome at the 2001 general census, followed until 2015. We selected residents aged 15-65 years at baseline. For each subject, we had information on sex, age and occupation (occupational status and type of job) according to the Italian General Census recognition.
Main outcome measures: We investigated all-cause, cancer, cardiovascular and accidental mortality, major causes of death in the working-age population. We used Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association between occupation and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in men and women.
Results: We selected 1 466 726 subjects (52.1% women). 42 715 men and 29 915 women died during the follow-up. In men, 47.8% of deaths were due to cancer, 26.7% to cardiovascular causes and 6.4% to accidents, whereas in women 57.8% of deaths were due to cancer, 19.3% to cardiovascular causes and 3.5% to accidents. We found an association between occupational variables and mortality, more evident in men than in women. Compared with employed, unemployed had a higher risk of mortality for all causes with an HR=1.99 (95% CI 1.92 to 2.06) in men and an HR=1.49 (95% CI 1.39 to 1.60) in women. Compared with high-qualified non-manual workers, non-specialised manual workers had a higher mortality risk (HR=1.68, 95% CI 1.59 to 1.77 and HR=1.30, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.40, for men and women, respectively).
Conclusions: This study shows the importance of occupational variables as social health determinants and provides evidence for policy-makers on the necessity of integrated and preventive policies aimed at improving the safety of the living and the working environment.
Keywords: cohort studies; epidemiology; health inequalities; public health.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Weltgesundheitsorganisation Health in 2015: from MDGs. millennium development goals to SDGs. sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
-
- Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Stockholm. Sweden: Institute for Futures Studies, 1991.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources