Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):e034373.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034373.

Monitoring patients with acute dyspnoea with a serial focused ultrasound of the heart and the lungs (MODUS): a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, open-label, pragmatic and controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Monitoring patients with acute dyspnoea with a serial focused ultrasound of the heart and the lungs (MODUS): a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, open-label, pragmatic and controlled trial

Michael D Arvig et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Among patients admitted to an emergency department, dyspnoea is one of the most common symptoms. Patients with dyspnoea have high mortality and morbidity. Therefore, novel methods to monitor the patients are warranted. The aim is to investigate whether therapy guided by monitoring patients with acute dyspnoea with serial ultrasound examinations of the heart and the lungs together with standard care can change the severity of dyspnoea compared with treatment guided by standard monitoring alone.

Methods and analysis: The study will be conducted as a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic, open-label and controlled trial where patients admitted with acute dyspnoea to an emergency ward will be randomised into a standard care group and a serial ultrasound group with 103 patients in each. All patients will be examined with an ultrasound of the heart and the lungs upfront. In addition, the patients in the serial ultrasound group will be examined with an ultrasound of the heart and lungs two more times to guide further therapy during the admittance. The primary outcome is a change in dyspnoea on a verbal scale. After discharge, the patients are followed for 1 year to assess the number of readmissions, death and length of hospital stay.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics for Region Zealand, Denmark (identifier SJ-744). Data handling agreement with participating centres has been made (identifier REG-056-2019). The General Data Protection Regulation and the Danish Data Protection Act will be respected. The results of the trial will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals regardless of the outcomes.

Trial registration number: NCT04091334.

Keywords: dyspnoea; focused cardiac ultrasound; inferior vena cava; lung ultrasound; monitoring; serial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow diagram for the randomised trial. ABG, arterial blood gas; CXR, chest X-ray; ED, emergency department; FLUS, focused lung ultrasound; FoCUS, focused cardiac ultrasound; US, ultrasound; VDS, Verbal Dyspnoea Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) statement. †Age, sex, smoker status, alcohol, medical history and medications. ‡Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral saturation and temperature. §One or both legs. ¶Haemoglobin, leucocytes, platelets, sodium, potassium, creatinine, C-reactive protein, D-dimer and troponins. #pH, PCO2, O2, bicarbonate, base excess and lactate. ††CT, MR, angiography and others. ‡‡Antibiotics, fluid, inhaled medication, diuretics, antihypertensive and others. ABG, arterial blood gas; CXR, chest X-ray; FLUS, focused lung ultrasound; FoCUS, focused cardiac ultrasound; ICU, intensive care unit; IVC, inferior vena cava; US, ultrasound; VDS, Verbal Dyspnoea Scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mockel M, Searle J, Muller R, et al. . Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? the Charité emergency medicine study (CHARITEM). Eur J Emerg Med 2013;20:103–8. 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ray P, Birolleau S, Lefort Y, et al. . Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: etiology, emergency diagnosis and prognosis. Crit Care 2006;10:R82. 10.1186/cc4926 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindskou TA, Pilgaard L, Søvsø MB, et al. . Symptom, diagnosis and mortality among respiratory emergency medical service patients. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213145. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213145 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayen A, Herigstad M, Pattinson KTS. Understanding dyspnea as a complex individual experience. Maturitas 2013;76:45–50. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.06.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oxberry SG, Bland JM, Clark AL, et al. . Minimally clinically important difference in chronic breathlessness: every little helps. Am Heart J 2012;164:229–35. 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data