Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 19;56(5):1902356.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02356-2019. Print 2020 Nov.

Complications following symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction

Affiliations
Free article

Complications following symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction

Ala Eddin S Sagar et al. Eur Respir J. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Thoracentesis using suction is perceived to have increased risk of complications, including pneumothorax and re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPO). Current guidelines recommend limiting drainage to 1.5 L to avoid REPO. Our purpose was to examine the incidence of complications with symptom-limited drainage of pleural fluid using suction and identify risk factors for REPO.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who underwent symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction at our institution between January 1, 2004 and August 31, 2018 was performed, and a total of 10 344 thoracenteses were included.

Results: Pleural fluid ≥1.5 L was removed in 19% of the procedures. Thoracentesis was stopped due to chest discomfort (39%), complete drainage of fluid (37%) and persistent cough (13%). Pneumothorax based on chest radiography was detected in 3.98%, but only 0.28% required intervention. The incidence of REPO was 0.08%. The incidence of REPO increased with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥3 compounded with ≥1.5 L (0.04-0.54%; 95% CI 0.13-2.06 L). Thoracentesis in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift did not increase complications, but less fluid was removed (p<0.01).

Conclusions: Symptom-limited thoracentesis using suction is safe even with large volumes. Pneumothorax requiring intervention and REPO are both rare. There were no increased procedural complications in those with ipsilateral mediastinal shift. REPO increased with poor ECOG PS and drainage ≥1.5 L. Symptom-limited drainage using suction without pleural manometry is safe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A.E.S. Sagar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.F. Landaeta has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.M. Adrianza has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G.L. Aldana has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Pozo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Armas-Villalba has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.C. Toquica has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.J. Larson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.R. Vial has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H.B. Grosu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.E. Ost has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G.A. Eapen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Sheshadri has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.C. Morice has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V.R. Shannon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Bashoura has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.D. Balachandran has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F.A. Almeida has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.H. Uzbeck has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.F. Casal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.A. Faiz has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.A. Jimenez has nothing to disclose.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources