Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 15:11:405.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00405. eCollection 2020.

"Overcoming the Fear That Haunts Your Success" - The Effectiveness of Interventions for Reducing the Impostor Phenomenon

Affiliations

"Overcoming the Fear That Haunts Your Success" - The Effectiveness of Interventions for Reducing the Impostor Phenomenon

Mirjam Zanchetta et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The impostor phenomenon (IP) refers to intense thoughts of fraudulence reported by high-achieving individuals. Since it has been shown to account for several personal and work-related complications, effective interventions are greatly needed. Against the background of mindset theory, we developed and tested two mindset interventions. We evaluated the impact of a coaching and a training intervention adopting a randomized controlled outcome design. One hundred and three young employees were randomly assigned to receive coaching (n = 36), training (n = 33), or no intervention (n = 34). Results reveal that coaching was an effective mindset intervention for sustainably reducing IP scores. Fear of negative evaluation emerged to mediate the relation between the coaching intervention and the reduced IP scores significantly. Moreover, coaching improved self-enhancing attributions and self-efficacy and reduced the tendency to cover up errors as well as the fear of negative evaluation. Training was superior in regard to knowledge acquisition. Specific implications are discussed.

Keywords: coaching; impostor phenomenon; intervention; mindset theory; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Imposter phenomenon scores by condition and measurement time point. T0 = preintervention; T1 = immediately after the intervention; T2 = 5 weeks post-intervention.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The effects of the coaching intervention (Contrast A) on IP scores via positive and negative features. Values in square brackets represent the 95% bias-corrected confidence interval for indirect effects. p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

References

    1. Bandura A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84 191–215. 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauer J., Festner D., Harteis C., Heid H., Gruber H. (2004). Fehlerorientierung im betrieblichen Arbeitsalltag. Ein Vergleich zwischen Führungskräften und Beschäftigten ohne Führungsfunktion [Error orientation in the workday. A comparison between executives and nonmanagement employees]. Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik 100 65–82.
    1. Bernard N. S., Dollinger S. J., Ramaniah N. V. (2002). Applying the big five personality factors to the impostor phenomenon. J. Pers. Assess. 78 321–333. 10.1207/s15327752jpa7802_07 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biberacher L. (2010). Evaluation einer Coachingausbildung [Evaluation of a Coaching Training]. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Regensburg, Regensburg.
    1. Bond C., Seneque M. (2013). Conceptualizing coaching as an approach to management and organizational development. J. Manag. Dev. 32 57–72. 10.3109/0142159X.2012.643835 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources