Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;87(2):237-255.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.14407. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Pharmacogenomics of anticancer drugs: Personalising the choice and dose to manage drug response

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Pharmacogenomics of anticancer drugs: Personalising the choice and dose to manage drug response

Daniel F Carr et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

The field of pharmacogenomics has made great strides in oncology over the last 20 years and indeed a significant number of pre-emptive genetic tests are now routinely undertaken prior to anticancer drug administration. Many of these gene-drug interactions are the fruits of candidate gene and genome-wide association studies, which have largely focused on common genetic variants (allele frequency>1%). Examples where there is clinical utility include genotyping or phenotyping for G6PD to prevent rasburicase-induced RBC haemolysis, and TPMT to prevent thiopurine-induced bone marrow suppression. Other associations such as CYP2D6 status in determining the efficacy of tamoxifen are more controversial because of contradictory evidence from different sources, which has led to variability in the implementation of testing. As genomic technology becomes ever cheaper and more accessible, we must look to the additional data our genome can provide to explain interindividual variability in anticancer drug response. Clearly genes do not act on their own and it is therefore important to investigate genetic factors in conjunction with clinical factors, interacting concomitant drug therapies and other factors such as the microbiome, which can all affect drug disposition. Taking account of all of these factors, in conjunction with the somatic genome, is more likely to provide better predictive accuracy in determining anticancer drug response, both efficacy and safety. This review summarises the existing knowledge related to the pharmacogenomics of anticancer drugs and discusses areas of opportunity for further advances in personalisation of therapy in order to improve both drug safety and efficacy.

Keywords: cancer; drug efficacy; drug safety; oncology; personalised medicine; pharmacogenomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Luzzatto L, Arese P. Favism and Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:60-71.
    1. Relling MV, McDonagh EM, Chang T, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for rasburicase therapy in the context of G6PD deficiency genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96:169-174.
    1. Adminsitration FD. Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labeling. In, 2019.
    1. Thiesen S, Yin P, Jorgensen AL, et al. TPMT, COMT and ACYP2 genetic variants in paediatric cancer patients with cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2017;27:213-222.
    1. Xu H, Robinson GW, Huang J, et al. Common variants in ACYP2 influence susceptibility to cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Nat Genet. 2015;47:263-266.