Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Oct;126(4):441-446.
doi: 10.1111/bju.15127. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

Favourable multi-institutional experience with penoscrotal decompression for prolonged ischaemic priapism

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Favourable multi-institutional experience with penoscrotal decompression for prolonged ischaemic priapism

Adam S Baumgarten et al. BJU Int. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To report our multi-institutional experience using penoscrotal decompression (PSD) for the surgical treatment of prolonged ischaemic priapism (PIP).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records for patients with PIP treated with PSD between 2017 and 2020. Priapisms were confirmed as ischaemic based on clinical presentations and cavernosal blood gas abnormalities. Treatment with irrigation and injection of α-agonists in all patients had failed prior to PSD. Patient characteristics, peri-operative variables and outcomes, and changes in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores were evaluated.

Results: We analysed 25 patients who underwent a total of 27 PSD procedures. The mean duration of priapism at initial presentation was 71.0 h. Irrigations and injections in all patients had failed, while corporoglanular shunt treatment in 48.0% of patients (12/25) had also failed prior to PSD. Of the 10 patients who underwent unilateral PSD, two (20.0%) had priapism recurrence. Both were treated with bilateral PSD, with prompt and lasting detumescence. Among the 15 patients undergoing primary bilateral PSD, none had priapism recurrence. Of the 15 patients with documented sexual function status at last follow-up, nine (60%) reported spontaneous erectile function adequate for penetration, while six (40%) reported erectile dysfunction. The median (interquartile range) decrease in IIEF-5 score was 3.5 (0-6.75) points after PSD. Two patients underwent uneventful inflatable penile prosthesis placement following PSD.

Conclusions: Penoscrotal decompression presents a simple, safe, highly effective and easily reproducible procedure for resolution of PIP. PSD should be considered as a viable salvage or alternative strategy to corporoglanular shunt procedures.

Keywords: #andrology; #erectiledysfunction; #priapism; erectile dysfunction; priapism; surgical management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Broderick GA, Kadioglu A, Bivalacqua TJ, Ghanem H, Nehra A, Shamloul R. Priapism: pathogenesis, epidemiology, and management. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 476-500
    1. Muneer A, Ralph D. Guideline of guidelines: priapism. BJU Int 2017; 119: 204-8
    1. Salonia A, Eardley I, Giuliano F et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on priapism. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 480-9
    1. Montague DK, Jarow J, Broderick GA et al. American Urological Association guideline on the management of priapism. J Urol 2003; 170: 1318-24
    1. Zacharakis E, Garaffa G, Raheem AA, Christopher AN, Muneer A, Ralph DJ. Penile prosthesis insertion in patients with refractory ischaemic priapism: early vs delayed implantation. BJU Int 2014; 114: 576-81

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources