Comment on "Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions"
- PMID: 32502080
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004023
Comment on "Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions"
Conflict of interest statement
The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003435. Ann Surg. 2020. PMID: 31860549 Review.
References
-
- Kuper TM, Murphy PB, Kaur B, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy incisions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2020; 271:67–74.
-
- Zwanenburg PR, Tol BT, Obdeijn MC, et al. Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and GRADE assessment of randomized and nonrandomized studies of incisional negative pressure wound therapy versus control dressings for the prevention of postoperative wound complications. Ann Surg 2019; PMID: 31592899.
-
- Bowater RJ, Stirling SA, Lilford RJ. Is antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery a generally effective intervention? Testing a generic hypothesis over a set of meta-analyses. Ann Surg 2009; 249:551–556.
-
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64:1283–1293.
-
- Cochrane Handbook. Recommendations on Testing for Funnel Plot Asymmetry. Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_10/10_4_3_1_recommendations_on... . Accessed January 6, 2020
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
