Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Aug;26(8):1094.e7-1094.e10.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of rapid serological tests and ELISA to molecular diagnostics in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 presenting to the hospital

D S Y Ong  1 , S J de Man  2 , F A Lindeboom  3 , J G M Koeleman  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of rapid serological tests and ELISA to molecular diagnostics in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 presenting to the hospital

D S Y Ong et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance of rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFAs) compared with an ELISA and nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) in individuals with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Methods: Patients presenting to a Dutch teaching hospital were eligible between 17 March and 10 April 2020, when they had respiratory symptoms that were suspected for COVID-19. The performances of six different LFAs were evaluated in plasma samples obtained on corresponding respiratory sample dates of NATs testing. Subsequently, the best performing LFA was evaluated in 228 patients and in 50 sera of a historical patient control group.

Results: In the pilot analysis, sensitivity characteristics of LFA were heterogeneous, ranging from 2/20 (10%; 95% CI 0%-23%) to 11/20 (55%; 95% CI 33%-77%). In the total cohort, Orient Gene Biotech COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test LFA had a sensitivity of 43/99 (43%; 95% CI 34%-53%) and specificity of 126/129 (98%; 95% CI 95%-100%). Sensitivity increased to 31/52 (60%; 95% CI 46%-73%) in patients with at least 7 days of symptoms, and to 21/33 (64%; 95% CI 47%-80%) in patients with C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥100 mg/L. Sensitivity and specificity of Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab ELISA was 59/95 (62%; 95% CI 52%-72%) and 125/128 (98%; 95% CI 95%-100%) in all patients, respectively, but sensitivity increased to 38/48 (79%; 95% CI 68%-91%) in patients with at least 7 days of symptoms.

Conclusions: There is large variability in diagnostic test performance between rapid LFAs, but overall limited sensitivity and high specificity in acutely admitted patients. Sensitivity improved in patients with longer existing symptoms or high CRP. LFAs should only be considered as additional triage tools when these may lead to the improvement of hospital logistics.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; ELISA; Lateral flow immunoassay; Rapid test; Serology; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Guan W.-J., Ni Z.-Y., Hu Y., Liang W.-H., Ou C.-Q., He J.-X. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. NEJMoa2002032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kinross P., Suetens C., Gomes Dias J., Alexakis L., Wijermans A., Colzani E. Rapidly increasing cumulative incidence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the European union/European economic area and the United Kingdom, 1 January to 15 March 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25:1647. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Current information about the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Bilthoven: RIVM. https://www.rivm.nl/en/current-information-about-novel-coronavirus-covid-19 Accessed 15 April 2020. Available from:
    1. Caliendo A.M., Gilbert D.N., Ginocchio C.C., Hanson K.E., May L., Quinn T.C. Better tests, better care: improved diagnostics for infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:S139–S170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zou L., Ruan F., Huang M., Liang L., Huang H., Hong Z. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1177–1179. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms