Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug 3;86(16):e00724-20.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00724-20. Print 2020 Aug 3.

Metagenomics as a Tool To Monitor Reclaimed-Water Quality

Affiliations
Review

Metagenomics as a Tool To Monitor Reclaimed-Water Quality

Pei-Ying Hong et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

Many biological contaminants are disseminated through water, and their occurrence has potential detrimental impacts on public and environmental health. Conventional monitoring tools rely on cultivation and are not robust in addressing modern water quality concerns. This review proposes metagenomics as a means to provide a rapid, nontargeted assessment of biological contaminants in water. When further coupled with appropriate methods (e.g., quantitative PCR and flow cytometry) and bioinformatic tools, metagenomics can provide information concerning both the abundance and diversity of biological contaminants in reclaimed waters. Further correlation between the metagenomic-derived data of selected contaminants and the measurable parameters of water quality can also aid in devising strategies to alleviate undesirable water quality. Here, we review metagenomic approaches (i.e., both sequencing platforms and bioinformatic tools) and studies that demonstrated their use for reclaimed-water quality monitoring. We also provide recommendations on areas of improvement that will allow metagenomics to significantly impact how the water industry performs reclaimed-water quality monitoring in the future.

Keywords: metagenomics; reclaimed water; water quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Number of publications associated with each keyword set and retrieved from Scopus from 2011 to 2019.

References

    1. Harwood VJ, Levine AD, Scott TM, Chivukula V, Lukasik J, Farrah SR, Rose JB. 2005. Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3163–3170. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3163-3170.2005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leclerc H, Schwartzbrod L, Dei-Cas E. 2002. Microbial agents associated with waterborne diseases. Crit Rev Microbiol 28:371–409. doi: 10.1080/1040-840291046768. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanganyado E, Gwenzi W. 2019. Antibiotic resistance in drinking water systems: occurrence, removal, and human health risks. Sci Total Environ 669:785–797. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lluch J, Servant F, Paisse S, Valle C, Valiere S, Kuchly C, Vilchez G, Donnadieu C, Courtney M, Burcelin R, Amar J, Bouchez O, Lelouvier B. 2015. The characterization of novel tissue microbiota using an optimized 16S metagenomic sequencing pipeline. PLoS One 10:e0142334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohd Shaufi MA, Sieo CC, Chong CW, Gan HM, Ho YW. 2015. Deciphering chicken gut microbial dynamics based on high-throughput 16S rRNA metagenomics analyses. Gut Pathog 7:4. doi: 10.1186/s13099-015-0051-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types