Why is use of donor eggs not viewed as treatment failure? A call for improvements in treatments with autologous oocytes
- PMID: 32504304
- PMCID: PMC7376996
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01847-x
Why is use of donor eggs not viewed as treatment failure? A call for improvements in treatments with autologous oocytes
Abstract
Based on national registry reports, after age 42, the number of IVF cycles utilizing autologous oocytes is very small; after age 43, autologous oocyte use in US IVF cycles is almost non-existent. We here argue that the in vitro fertilization (IVF) field has created a self-fulfilling prophecy by basically abandoning the utilization of autologous oocytes after ages 42-43 years. This not only resulted in almost no IVF cycles with autologous oocytes being performed but also in abandonment of research that could lead to improvements in IVF outcomes in older women when using autologous oocytes. As a consequence, IVF has largely stagnated in this area. We further argue that third-party oocyte donation in clinical IVF should be considered a treatment failure, as it requires patients to choose a second rather than a first-choice treatment. Such a redesignation of third-party egg donation would not only be appropriate but could lead to necessary changes in physician attitudes, considering that women almost exclusively prefer to conceive with their autologous oocytes.
Keywords: Advanced female age; Autologous oocytes; Donor eggs; In vitro fertilization (IVF).
Conflict of interest statement
N.G. is the owner of a for-profit fertility centre,
Figures
Similar articles
-
Establishment of comparative performance criteria for IVF centers: correlation of live birth rates in autologous and donor oocyte IVF cycles.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Dec 4;12:122. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-122. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014. PMID: 25475407 Free PMC article.
-
Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity in women with twin pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation.Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1922-1932. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa108. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32644142
-
Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):785-795. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa009. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32240287
-
The effect of hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media in donor oocyte cycles and autologous oocyte cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2022 Jun 30;37(7):1451-1469. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac097. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35595183
-
Improvements in IVF in women of advanced age.J Endocrinol. 2016 Jul;230(1):F1-6. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0105. Epub 2016 May 6. J Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 27154334 Review.
Cited by
-
Projecting the Contribution of Assisted Reproductive Technology to Completed Cohort Fertility.Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09765-3. Epub 2023 Feb 10. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023. PMID: 36789330 Free PMC article.
-
Is It Possible to Expand Oocyte Donors by Decreasing Number of Oocytes for Own Use? Insights From a Large Single-Center Study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 11;12:727339. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.727339. eCollection 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34867777 Free PMC article.
-
Oocyte Aging: A Multifactorial Phenomenon in A Unique Cell.Aging Dis. 2024 Feb 1;15(1):5-21. doi: 10.14336/AD.2023.0527. Aging Dis. 2024. PMID: 37307833 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in Donor Oocyte Cycles Compared to the Autologous Cycles in the Poseidon 4 Group of Poor Ovarian Responders.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 10;61(2):303. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020303. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40005420 Free PMC article.
-
Rate of rebound in follicle growth after cessation of ovarian stimulation in initial non-responders: a prospective cohort study.J Ovarian Res. 2021 Jan 9;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00765-5. J Ovarian Res. 2021. PMID: 33422140 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Letur H, Peigne M, Ohl J, Cedrin-Dunerin I, Mathieu-D’Argent E, Scheffler F, Grzgorczyk-Martin V, de Mouzon J. Hypertensive pathologies and egg donation pregnancies: results of a large comparative cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.031. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdallah H, Thum MY. Investigating psychological attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg shares: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(4):450–465. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw006. - DOI - PubMed
-
- CDC 2016, 2016 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report. https://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/2016/national-summary-figures.html
-
- SART 2016, https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=... (accessed March 4, 2019).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous