Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Aug:129:104480.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104480. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

Brief clinical evaluation of six high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assays

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Brief clinical evaluation of six high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody assays

Niko Kohmer et al. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Serological SARS-CoV-2 assays are urgently needed for diagnosis, contact tracing and for epidemiological studies. So far, there is limited data on how recently commercially available, high-throughput immunoassays, using different recombinant SARS-CoV-2 antigens, perform with clinical samples. Focusing on IgG and total antibodies, we demonstrate the performance of four automated immunoassays (Abbott Architect™ i2000 (N protein-based)), Roche cobas™ e 411 analyzer (N protein-based, not differentiating between IgA, IgM or IgG antibodies), LIAISON®XL platform (S1 and S2 protein-based), VIRCLIA® automation system (S1 and N protein-based) in comparison to two ELISA assays (Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG (S1 protein-based) and Virotech SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA (N protein-based)) and an in-house developed plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). We tested follow up serum/plasma samples of individuals PCR-diagnosed with COVID-19. When calculating the overall sensitivity, in a time frame of 49 days after first PCR-positivity, the PRNT as gold standard, showed the highest sensitivity with 93.3% followed by the dual-target assay for the VIRCLIA® automation system with 89%. The overall sensitivity in the group of N protein-based assays ranged from 66.7 to 77.8% and in the S protein-based-assays from 71.1 to 75.6%. Five follow-up samples of three individuals were only detected in either an S and/or N protein-based assay, indicating an individual different immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and the influence of the used assay in the detection of IgG antibodies. This should be further analysed. The specificity of the examined assays was ≥ 97%. However, because of the low or unknown prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, the examined assays in this study are currently primarily eligible for epidemiological investigations, as they have limited information in individual testing.

Keywords: Antibody; Assay; Evaluation; IgG; PRNT; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Sandra Ciesek received a speaker’s fee from Euroimmun. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Titers for the examined assays: (a) SARS-CoV-2-IgG (Abbott); (b) Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2; (c) Virotech SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgG; (d) Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun); (e) Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG; (f) COVID-19 VIRCLIA® IgG MONOTEST; (g) PRNT Titer for tested samples; 1 = samples from one individual, 2 + 3 = samples from two different individuals; bold horizontal lines show assay specific cut-off.

Comment in

References

    1. Rabi F.A., Al Zoubi M.S., Kasasbeh G.A., Salameh D.M., Al-Nasser A.D. SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus disease 2019: what we know so far. Pathogens. 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/pathogens9030231. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zheng S., Fan J., Yu F., Feng B., Lou B., Zou Q., Xie G., Lin S., Wang R., Yang X., Chen W., Wang Q., Zhang D., Liu Y., Gong R., Ma Z., Lu S., Xiao Y., Gu Y., Zhang J., Yao H., Xu K., Lu X., Wei G., Zhou J., Fang Q., Cai H., Qiu Y., Sheng J., Chen Y., Liang T. Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang province, China, January-March 2020: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1443. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajendran K., Krishnasamy N., Rangarajan J., Rathinam J., Natarajan M., Ramachandran A. Convalescent plasma transfusion for the treatment of COVID-19: systematic review. J. Med. Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25961. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ou X., Liu Y., Lei X., Li P., Mi D., Ren L., Guo L., Guo R., Chen T., Hu J., Xiang Z., Mu Z., Chen X., Chen J., Hu K., Jin Q., Wang J., Qian Z. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1620. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xiang F., Wang X., He X., Peng Z., Yang B., Zhang J., Zhou Q., Ye H., Ma Y., Li H., Wei X., Cai P., Ma W.-L. Antibody detection and dynamic characteristics in patients with COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa461. - DOI - PMC - PubMed