Ultrahypofractionated versus hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials
- PMID: 32505965
- DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.037
Ultrahypofractionated versus hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials
Abstract
Introduction: To characterize the efficacy (5-year disease-free survival [DFS]) and safety (incidence of grade 2+ late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity) of ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy (UHRT) versus hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) and conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) by comparing patients treated on phase III protocols.
Methods: A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE protocol was used to identify eligible studies. Weighted random effects meta-analyses were conducted using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Wald-type tests were used to compare treatment modalities for each outcome, where the null hypothesis was rejected for p < 0.05.
Results: Seven studies were included that consisted of 6795 patients (2849 CFRT, 3357 HFRT, and 589 UHRT). Median age was 68 years. Summary effect sizes for 5-year DFS were 85.1% (95% CI: 82.1%-87.8%) for CFRT, 86% (95% CI: 83%-88.7%) for HFRT, and 85% (95% CI: 80%-87%) for UHRT (p = 0.66 and p = 0.8 for CFRT vs. HFRT and CFRT versus UHRT, respectively). Summary effect sizes for late grade 2+ gastrointestinal toxicity were 12.1% (95% CI: 9.2%-15.4%) for CFRT, 14.6% (95% CI: 9.9%-20%) for HFRT, and 10% (95% CI: 7%-13%) for UHRT (p = 0.41 and p = 0.09 for CFRT versus HFRT and CFRT versusus UHRT, respectively). Summary effect sizes for late grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity were 19.4% (95% CI: 10.7-29.9%) for CFRT, 20.4% (95% CI: 10.2%-32.9%) for HFRT, and 18% (95% CI: 15%-22%) for UHRT (p = 0.89 and p = 0.92 for CFRT versus HFRT and CFRT versus UHRT, respectively).
Conclusion: Ultrahypofrationated regimens appear to offer similar levels of safety and efficacy to CFRT and HFRT. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require further validation by ongoing prospective trials.
Keywords: Prostate cancer; Radiation oncology; Stereotactic body radiation therapy; Toxicity; Urology.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Clinical Outcomes of the CHIRP Trial: A Phase II Prospective Randomized Trial of Conventionally Fractionated Versus Moderately Hypofractionated Prostate and Pelvic Nodal Radiation Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer.Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep-Oct;11(5):384-393. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33705985 Clinical Trial.
-
Elective pelvic nodal irradiation in the setting of ultrahypofractionated versus moderately hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Outcomes from 3 prospective clinical trials.Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 16;49:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100843. eCollection 2024 Nov. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39318680 Free PMC article.
-
Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer (HYDRA): an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials in the MARCAP consortium.Lancet Oncol. 2025 Apr;26(4):459-469. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00034-8. Epub 2025 Mar 17. Lancet Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40112848
-
Conventionally fractionated radiation therapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (CRiSP): An international systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2120-2131. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32756. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32125712
-
Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated image-guided volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a phase II randomized trial from China.Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Feb 26;13(5):6936-6944. doi: 10.18632/aging.202551. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Aging (Albany NY). 2021. PMID: 33653964 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Nov;18(11):643-668. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00497-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6. Nat Rev Urol. 2021. PMID: 34363040 Review.
-
Proximity to Radiotherapy Center, Population, Average Income, and Health Insurance Status as Predictors of Cancer Mortality at the County Level in the United States.JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Sep;9:e2300130. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00130. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37769217 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective Randomized Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) vs. Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy (CFRT) for Chinese Patients with Early-Stage Localized Prostate Cancer.Curr Oncol. 2021 Dec 22;29(1):27-37. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29010003. Curr Oncol. 2021. PMID: 35049677 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Toxicity After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multi-institutional Matched Case-Control Series.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Aug 28;6(6):100759. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100759. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34585025 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive Factors for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicities in Prostate Cancer External Beam Radiotherapy: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 26;15(11):1331. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111331. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40506902 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical