Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;20(12):3631-3638.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.16098. Epub 2020 Jun 28.

Impact of the elimination of the donation service area on United States lung transplant practices and outcomes at high and low competition centers

Affiliations
Free article

Impact of the elimination of the donation service area on United States lung transplant practices and outcomes at high and low competition centers

Claire Drolen et al. Am J Transplant. 2020 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

In November 2017, the donation service area (DSA) was removed as the primary unit of US donor lung allocation. Our primary objective was to evaluate the effect of this change on recipient characteristics, the use of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and on index hospitalization length of stay (LOS) and early posttransplant complications. We also assessed whether these outcomes differed in high and low competition centers, as defined by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Following DSA removal, there was a 9-day decrease in median waitlist time (P = .001) and an increase in median lung allocation score (40 vs 42, P < .0001) but no difference in the need for pretransplant ECMO (incidence rate ratio = 1.16, P = .12). Median LOS increased from 17 to 19 days in the post-DSA era (P = .01). There was no difference in posttransplant outcomes, including prolonged ventilation, new dialysis, or early survival, in the general cohort or between competition groups. High competition centers saw an 18.5-minute increase in ischemic time compared to low competition centers (P = .04) but did not differentially increase single lung transplants or pretransplant ECMO utilization. Overall, DSA elimination was associated with increased posttransplant LOS but no significant differences in pretransplant ECMO or other posttransplant outcomes. Effects were largely similar at low and high competition centers.

Keywords: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); clinical research/practice; disparities; ethics and public policy; lung disease; lung transplantation/pulmonology; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Veatch R. Transplantation Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
    1. Kosztowski M, Zhou S, Bush E, Higgins R, Sergev D, Gentry S. Geographic disparities in lung transplant rates. Am J Transplant. 2019;19:1491-1497.
    1. Russo MJ, Meltzer D, Merlo A, et al. Local allocation of lung donors results in transplanting lungs in lower priority transplant recipients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1231-1235.
    1. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. The Final Rule. 1998. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=bb60e0a7222f4086a88c31211cac77... .
    1. Miriam Holman V. United States Department of Health and Human Services. United States District Court Southern District of New York. 2017. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/2394/plaintiff_request_for_tro_20.... Accessed July 20, 2019.