Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;192(1):33-49.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.16807. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

CRISPR/Cas9 for the treatment of haematological diseases: a journey from bacteria to the bedside

Affiliations
Review

CRISPR/Cas9 for the treatment of haematological diseases: a journey from bacteria to the bedside

Olivier Humbert et al. Br J Haematol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Genome editing therapies represent a significant advancement in next-generation, precision medicine for the management of haematological diseases, and CRISPR/Cas9 has to date been the most successful implementation platform. From discovery in bacteria and archaea over three decades ago, through intensive basic research and pre-clinical development phases involving the modification of therapeutically relevant cell types, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing is now being investigated in ongoing clinic trials. Despite the widespread enthusiasm brought by this new technology, significant challenges remain before genome editing can be routinely recommended and implemented in the clinic. These include risks of genotoxicity resulting from off-target DNA cleavage or chromosomal rearrangement, and suboptimal efficacy of homology-directed repair editing strategies, which thus limit therapeutic options. Practical hurdles such as high costs and inaccessibility to patients outside specialised centres must also be addressed. Future improvements in this rapidly developing field should circumvent current limitations with novel editing platforms and with the simplification of clinical protocols using in vivo delivery of editing reagents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

H.-P.K is consulting for Rocket Pharma, Homology Medicines, CSL Behring, Vor Biopharma, and Magenta Therapeutics. Other authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Timeline describing the important chapters of CRISPR/Cas9 development and other editing platform development.
Notable publications associated with time events: 1986: (Kolodkin, et al 1986); 1987: (Ishino, et al 1987); 1996: (Kim, et al 1996); 2002: (Jansen, et al 2002); 2005: (Bolotin, et al 2005, Mojica, et al 2005, Pourcel, et al 2005); 2010: (Christian, et al 2010, Li, et al 2011); 2013: (Boissel, et al 2014, Cho, et al 2013, Cong, et al 2013, Mali, et al 2013a, Mali, et al 2013b); 2014: (Hendel, et al 2015, Mandal, et al 2014).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Simplified mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
Single guide RNA (sgRNA)-mediated recognition of the chromosomal target sequence via the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence. A double-stranded cut occurs 3 nucleotides upstream of the PAM sequence and enlists the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR) pathways. INDELS= insertions and deletions.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Schematic of engineering of universal T cells by CRISPR/Cas9-knockout of different receptor molecules or by knockin of a CAR using lentiviral vector or CRISPR/Cas9-knockin.
B2M= Beta 2 microglobulin; CD52=cluster of differentiation 52; CAR=chimeric antigen receptor; PD1= Programmed cell death protein 1; TCR= T cell receptor.

References

    1. Abou-El-Enein M, Cathomen T, Ivics Z, June CH, Renner M, Schneider CK & Bauer G (2017) Human genome editing in the clinic: New challenges in regulatory benefit-risk assessment. Cell Stem Cell, 21, 427–430. - PubMed
    1. Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, Lunning MA, Wang ML, Arnason JE, Mehta A, Purev E, Maloney DG, Andreadis C, Sehgal AR, Solomon SR, Ghosh N, Albertson T, Garcia J, Kostic A, Li D, Kim Y & Siddiqi T (2019) Pivotal safety and efficacy results from Transcend NHL 001, a multicenter phase 1 study of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphomas (Abstract). Blood, 134, 241–241 (doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-127508). - DOI
    1. Agudelo D, Duringer A, Bozoyan L, Huard CC, Carter S, Loehr J, Synodinou D, Drouin M, Salsman J, Dellaire G, Laganiere J & Doyon Y (2017) Marker-free coselection for CRISPR-driven genome editing in human cells. Nature Methods, 14, 615–620. - PubMed
    1. Akcakaya P, Bobbin ML, Guo JA, Malagon-Lopez J, Clement K, Garcia SP, Fellows MD, Porritt MJ, Firth MA, Carreras A, Baccega T, Seeliger F, Bjursell M, Tsai SQ, Nguyen NT, Nitsch R, Mayr LM, Pinello L, Bohlooly YM, Aryee MJ, Maresca M & Joung JK (2018) In vivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations. Nature, 561, 416–419. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, Sousa AA, Koblan LW, Levy JM, Chen PJ, Wilson C, Newby GA, Raguram A & Liu DR (2019) Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature, 576, 149–157. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types