Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;17(2):331-338.
doi: 10.1177/1558944720928475. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in the United States in Privately Insured and Medicare Advantage Enrollees

Sanjeev Kakar  1 , Mohamed Noureldin  2 , Holly K Van Houten  1   3 , Raphael Mwangi  1 , Lindsey R Sangaralingham  1   3
Affiliations

Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in the United States in Privately Insured and Medicare Advantage Enrollees

Sanjeev Kakar et al. Hand (N Y). 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: This study aims to determine the trends in the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged 18 years and older. Methods: An administrative claims database of more than 100 million patients was used to identify patients aged 18 years and older with a DRF between 2005 and 2014. A total of 137 130 DRFs were identified in 135 128 patients. Results: The proportion and rate of fractures were more predominant in those aged 55 years and older compared with a decreasing incidence in patients younger than 55 years. Age-adjusted rates of surgical treatment have significantly increased in both women and men by 15.9% (absolute change, 4.8%) and 5.0% (absolute change, 1.7%) change over time, respectively. Conversely, age-adjusted rates of nonsurgical treatment have significantly decreased overtime in both women and men by 6.9% and 2.6%, respectively. Conclusions: These data provide better understanding of the epidemiology of DRF, which is important to develop preventive strategies targeting high-risk populations and to develop effective treatment strategies.

Keywords: distal radius fractures; epidemiology; incidence; the United States; trends.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Age-specific rates of distal radius fractures per 100 000 enrollees.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Annual percentages of treatment modalities of distal radius fractures.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Age-adjusted rates of distal radius fracture treatment per 100 fractures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bruce KK, Merenstein DJ, Narvaez MV, et al.. Lack of agreement on distal radius fracture treatment. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(2):218-225. - PubMed
    1. Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(5):908-915. - PubMed
    1. Ilyas AM, Jupiter JB. Distal radius fractures—classification of treatment and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin N Am. 2007;38:167-173. - PubMed
    1. Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2012;28:113-125. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1868-1873. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types