Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;17(4):269-280.
doi: 10.1007/s11904-020-00506-1.

A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Technology-Assisted HIV Testing Interventions

Keith J Horvath et al. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to describe and assess the literature on mobile health (mHealth) and other technology-based HIV testing interventions published in the 5-year period from 2015 to 2020.

Recent findings: We identified 18 published technology-based studies, 6 of which were efficacy trials and the remaining 12 were either pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental studies. Most (n = 10) interventions were conducted outside the USA, including countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 4), China (n = 3), Latin America (n = 2), and India (n = 1). All efficacy trials showed some evidence of efficacy, although uptake of HIV testing was low among in intervention trials that consisted of a low number of text messages. Most pilot RCTs demonstrated high levels of feasibility and acceptability, as well as some evidence that the intervention participants benefited more than the control group. Many non-randomized trials similarly reported positive appraisal by study participants. Recommendations for future research and practice by the authors of the studies reviewed here are summarized. Technology-assisted HIV testing interventions may be an important strategy to reach national and global targets for HIV status awareness in the general population and for most at-risk groups. Although there appears to be growing evidence of their benefit, questions linger regarding how to leverage existing social media platforms to promote HIV testing, which interventions work for what populations, and best practices for scaling up mHealth and other technology-based interventions.

Keywords: HIV; Intervention; Testing; eHealth; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PubMed search strategy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNAIDS. Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2019 fact sheet. 2019 [cited 2020 February 4]; Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet.
    1. UNAIDS. Fast track: ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030. 2014; Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/20140925_Fast_Tra.... [Accessed 3 June 2020]
    1. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844–845. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV care saves lives: vital suppression is key. 2014 [cited 2019 June 5]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/hiv-aids-medical-care/index.html.
    1. Patel D, Johnson CH, Krueger A, Maciak B, Belcher L, Harris N, DiNenno EA. Trends in HIV testing among US adults, aged 18-64 years, 2011-2017. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(2):532–539. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02689-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types