Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 18:21:278-282.
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.05.015. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.

Orthopaedics and neurosurgery: Is there a difference in surgical outcomes following anterior cervical spinal fusion?

Affiliations

Orthopaedics and neurosurgery: Is there a difference in surgical outcomes following anterior cervical spinal fusion?

Gautham Prabhakar et al. J Orthop. .

Abstract

Objective: The superiority of neurosurgical over orthopaedic spinal procedures is a point of contention. While there is the perception that neurosurgeons are more specifically trained to deal with spinal pathology, no study has directly compared outcomes of spinal surgeries performed by both groups.

Methods: We sought to evaluate the differences in length of surgery, hospital stay, complications, mortality, and readmission for anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) performed by neurosurgeons versus orthopaedic surgeons.

Results: 17,967 ACDF procedures were analyzed. Neurosurgeons performed 74.3% of the fusions with a trend towards longer operative times and significantly more patients that were discharged to extended care facilities. There was no significant difference in the length of stay, overall complications, mortality, readmission, or reoperation when comparing the two specialties.

Conclusion: Despite a significantly higher volume of ACDF performed by neurosurgeons, outcomes are comparable following orthopaedic and neurosurgical procedures.

Keywords: ACDF; Anterior cervical decompression and fusion; Surgical outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest. We do not have any financial or personal relationships to disclose.

References

    1. Abraham D.J., Herkowitz H.N. Indications and trends in use in cervical spinal fusions. Orthop Clin N Am. 1998;29(4):731–744. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70044-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patil P.G., Turner D.A., Pietrobon R. National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990-2000. Neurosurgery. 2005:753–758. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000175729.79119.1d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alosh H., Riley L.H., Skolasky R.L. Insurance status, geography, race, and ethnicity as predictors of anterior cervical spine surgery rates and in-hospital mortality. Spine. 2009;34(18):1956–1962. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181ab930e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohlman H.H., Emery S.E., Goodfellow D.B., Jones P.K. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(9):1298–1307. http://jbjs.org/content/jbjsam/75/9/1298.full.pdf - PubMed
    1. Cauthen J.C., Kinard R.E., Vogler J.B. Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients. Spine. 1998;23(2):188–192. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00008. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources