Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 19:11:940.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00940. eCollection 2020.

The Implications of Motor and Cognitive Inhibition for Hot and Cool Executive Functions: The Case of Quadrato Motor Training

Rotem Leshem  1 , Antonio De Fano  2 , Tal Dotan Ben-Soussan  2
Affiliations
Review

The Implications of Motor and Cognitive Inhibition for Hot and Cool Executive Functions: The Case of Quadrato Motor Training

Rotem Leshem et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Enabling the ceasing of ongoing or prepotent responses and the controlling of interference, motor inhibition facilitates the development of executive functions (EFs) such as thought before action, decision-making, self-regulation of affect, motivation, and arousal. In the current paper, a characterization is offered of the relationship between motor inhibition and the executive functioning system, in the context of a proposed division into predominantly affective (hot) and cognitive (cool) components corresponding to neural trajectories originating in the prefrontal cortex. This division is central to understanding the effects of a specifically-structured sensorimotor movement training practice, known as Quadrato Motor Training (QMT), on hot and cool EFs. QMT's effects on crucial mechanisms of integrating different EF components are discussed.

Keywords: executive functions; motor inhibition; quadrato motor training; self regulation; sensorimotor training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Anderson P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychol. 8 71–82. 10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson P. J. (2010). “Towards a developmental model of executive function,” in Executive Functions and the Frontal Lobes, eds Anderson V., Jacobs R., Anderson P. J. (New York, NY: Psychology Press; ), 37–56.
    1. Aupperle R. L., Melrose A. J., Stein M. B., Paulus M. P. (2012). Executive function and PTSD: disengaging from trauma. Neuropharmacology 62 686–694. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.02.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banfield J., Wyland C. L., Macrae C. N., Münte T. F., Heatherton T. F. (2004). “The cognitive neuroscience of self regulation,” in The Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds Baumeister R. F., Vohs K. D. (New York, NY: Guilford; ), 62–83.
    1. Barbas H. (2000). Proceedings of the human cerebral cortex: from gene to structure and function connections underlying the synthesis of cognition, memory, and emotion in primate prefrontal cortices. Brain Res. Bull. 52 319–330. 10.1016/s0361-9230(99)00245-2 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources