Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May 15:2020:9485364.
doi: 10.1155/2020/9485364. eCollection 2020.

A Systematic Review of In Vitro Activity of Medicinal Plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp

Affiliations
Review

A Systematic Review of In Vitro Activity of Medicinal Plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp

Delfina Fernandes Hlashwayo et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Campylobacter spp. are zoonotic bacteria that cause gastroenteritis in humans and may cause extraintestinal infections such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, reactive arthritis, and bacteremia. Resistance to antibiotics is an increasing concern in the Sub-Saharan Africa; thus, search for alternatives such as plant-based active ingredients is important in order to develop new drugs.

Objectives: To present a systematic review of in vitro and in vivo studies of the antibacterial activity of medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp. Methodology. Studies published until March 2020 on medicinal plants used against Campylobacter spp. from each country of Sub-Saharan Africa were searched on PubMed, Science Direct, AJOL, and Google Scholar. Articles were selected based on the existence of information regarding in vitro and in vivo activity of medicinal plants against Campylobacter spp.

Results: A total of 47 medicinal plants belonging to 28 families were studied for in vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. No plant was studied in vivo. Plants from Fabaceae family were the most commonly studied. The plants with the strongest antimicrobial activities were Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and Terminalia macroptera. The root extracts from these plants were effective, and both had a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 25 μg/ml. Seven pure compounds were isolated and analyzed for activity against Campylobacter spp. The compound cryptolepine from C. sanguinolenta was the most effective with MIC values ranging between 6.25 and 25 μg/ml.

Conclusion: Several native plants from the Sub-Saharan Africa region were studied for in vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. Some plants seemed very effective against the bacteria. Chemical compounds from three plants have been isolated and analyzed, but further studies are needed in order to produce new and effective drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution and number of included studies by country of plant origin. Map made through https://mapchart.net/africa.html.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of studies by year of publication.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Frequency of analyzed plant parts.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Frequency solvents used for plant extracts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cheng Y-W., Fischer M. Campylobacter. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. - DOI
    1. García-Sánchez L., Melero B., Diez A. M., Jaime I., Rovira J. Characterization of Campylobacter species in Spanish retail from different fresh chicken products and their antimicrobial resistance. Food Microbiology. 2018;76:457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.07.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connerton I. F., Connerton P. L. Campylobacter Foodborne Disease. 3rd. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017. - DOI
    1. Kaakoush N. O., Castaño-Rodríguez N., Mitchell H. M., Man S. M. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2015;28(3):687–720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. García-Sánchez L., Melero B., Rovira J. Campylobacter in the Food Chain. Vol. 86. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources