Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 1;12(5):e474-e478.
doi: 10.4317/jced.56727. eCollection 2020 May.

The effect of osseodensification on implant stability and bone density: A prospective observational study

Aseel R Hindi  1 , Salwan Y Bede  2
Affiliations

The effect of osseodensification on implant stability and bone density: A prospective observational study

Aseel R Hindi et al. J Clin Exp Dent. .

Abstract

Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of implant site preparation in low-density bone using osseodensification method in terms of implant stability changes during the osseous healing period and peri-implant bone density using CBCT.

Material and methods: This prospective observational clinical study included 24 patients who received 46 dental implants that were installed in low-density bone using the osseodensification method. CBCT was used to measure the bone density pre- and postoperatively and implant stability was measured using Periotest® immediately after implant insertion and then after 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively. The data were analyzed using paired t-test and the probability value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Of the 46 implants, 43 were osseointegrated making the early survival of the implants 93.5%. There was a significant increase in bone density postoperatively; 337.6 ±182.9 compared to 265.3 ±173.9 Hounsfield units preoperatively. The primary implant stability was -2.7 ± 2.13 Periotest values (PTV), at the 6th week it decreased significantly (p<0.0001) to become 0.7 (± 4) PTV, and at the 12th week (secondary stability) it increased significantly (p<0.0001) to become -2.1 (± 2.8) PTV. The difference between primary and secondary stability was statistically non-significant (p=0.0814).

Conclusions: Osseodensification resulted in high primary stability and increased peri-implant bone density but it did not prevent the implant stability drop during the first 6 weeks after insertion of implants. Key words:Osseodensification, implant stability, low-density bone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative coronal view of CBCT showing the average bone density of the area apical to the proposed implant length (131.6 Hounsfield unit).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postoperative coronal view of CBCT showing the average bone density of the same area shown in figure 1 apical to the implant length in the early postoperative period (212.3 Hounsfield unit).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Line chart illustrating the changes in implant stability measured as periotest values (PTV) throughout the study period.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Witek L, Neiva R, Alifarag A, Shahraki F, Sayah G, Tovar N. Absence of healing impairment in osteotomies prepared via osseodensification drilling. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39:65–71. - PubMed
    1. Huwais S, Meyer EG. A novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:27–36. - PubMed
    1. Tian JH, Neiva R, Coelho PG, Witek L, Tovar NM, Lo IC. Alveolar ridge expansion: comparison of osseodensification and conventional osteotome techniques. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:607–610. - PubMed
    1. Tretto PHW, Fabris V, Cericato GO, Sarkis-Onofre R, Bacchi A. Does the instrument used for the implant site preparation influence the bone-implant interface? A systematic review of clinical and animal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:97–107. - PubMed
    1. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. A model study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2003;14:251–262. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources