Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;10(6):265.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02257-7. Epub 2020 May 24.

Epigenetic diversity of Saccharum spp. accessions assessed by methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP)

Affiliations

Epigenetic diversity of Saccharum spp. accessions assessed by methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP)

Alessandra Alves Martins et al. 3 Biotech. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

The epigenetic diversity of six genotype groups (commercial cultivars, S. officinarum, S. spontaneum, S. robustum, S. barberi, and Erianthus sp.) was assessed through methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP). A total of 1341 MSAP loci were analyzed, of which 1117 (83.29%) were susceptible to cytosine methylation and responsible for a higher proportion of overall diversity among genotypes. The MSAP selective primer combinations captured different proportions of internal and external cytosine methylation loci across genotype groups, while the average external cytosine frequency was higher for all genotype groups. The genotypes were divided into two subpopulations with a high differentiation index (φst = 0.086) based on epigenetic loci. The genotypes were clustered in three subgroups for both methylated and unmethylated loci, considering dissimilarity values. Four methylated fragments (MFs) were randomly selected and subsequently sequenced and compared with sugarcane public databases using BLASTN. MF alignments suggest that cytosine methylation occurs in sugarcane near CpG islands and tandem repeats within transcribed regions and putative cis-regulatory sequences, which assigned functions are associated with stress adaptation. These results provide the first insights about the distribution of this epigenetic mark in sugarcane genome, and suggest a biological relevance of methylated loci.

Keywords: Cytosine methylation; Epigenome diversity; Saccharum spp.; Wild accessions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Average percentages of unmethylation, external cytosine methylation, and internal cytosine methylation for the six sugarcane genotype groups (commercial, S. robustum, S. barberi, S. spontaneum, S. officinarum, and Erianthus sp.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Population epigenetic structure of the 60 sugarcane genotypes using the binary matrix of relative total methylation, transformed from the MSAP data set. a Inference of the optimal number of subpopulations (k) using the delta K variation (Δk), with k varying from 1 to 9. b Bar plot with each column representing the estimated membership coefficients, in K = 2, for each genotype, which are represented with numbers from 1 to 60 and grouped as follows: commercial (1–10), S. robustum (11–15), S. barberi (17–20), S. spontaneum (16, 21–43), S. officinarum (44–55), and Erianthus sp. (56–60). Subpopulation 1 and subpopulation 2 are represented by orange and green colors, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dendrogram of 60 sugarcane genotypes (commercial, S. robustum, S. barberi, S. spontaneum, S. officinarum, and Erianthus sp.) obtained via Neighbor Joining for methylation-susceptible loci (MSL) based on dissimilarity values (Jaccard complement). Bootstrap values are shown in the nodes
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Dendrogram of the 60 sugarcane genotypes (commercial, S. robustum, S. barberi, S. spontaneum, S. officinarum, and Erianthus sp.) obtained via Neighbor Joining for non-methylated loci (NML) based on dissimilarity values (Jaccard complement). Bootstrap values are shown in the nodes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abuzayed M, El-Dabba N, Frary A, Doganlar S. GDdom: an online tool for calculation of dominant marker gene diversity. Biochem Genet. 2017;55:155–157. doi: 10.1007/s10528-016-9779-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afzal AJ, Wood AJ, Lightfoot DA. Plant receptor-like serine threonine kinases: roles in signaling and plant defense. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008;21:507–517. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-5-0507. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aitken K, McNeil M. Diversity analysis. In: Henry R, Kole MC, editors. Genetics, genomics and breeding of sugarcane. 1. New York: Science Publishers; 2010. pp. 19–42.
    1. Aitken KS, Li JC, Jackson P, Piperidis G, McIntyre CL. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within Saccharum officinarum and comparison with sugarcane cultivars. Aust J Agric Res. 2006;57(11):1167–1184. doi: 10.1071/AR05391. - DOI
    1. Akimoto K, Katakami H, Kim HJ, Ogawa E, Sano CM, Wada Y, Sano H. Epigenetic inheritance in rice plants. Ann Bot. 2007;100:205–217. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm110. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources