Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Oct 15;39(23):3105-3119.
doi: 10.1002/sim.8593. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

A Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of prevalence data

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of prevalence data

Lianne Siegel et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

When conducting a meta-analysis involving prevalence data for an outcome with several subtypes, each of them is typically analyzed separately using a univariate meta-analysis model. Recently, multivariate meta-analysis models have been shown to correspond to a decrease in bias and variance for multiple correlated outcomes compared with univariate meta-analysis, when some studies only report a subset of the outcomes. In this article, we propose a novel Bayesian multivariate random effects model to account for the natural constraint that the prevalence of any given subtype cannot be larger than that of the overall prevalence. Extensive simulation studies show that this new model can reduce bias and variance when estimating subtype prevalences in the presence of missing data, compared with standard univariate and multivariate random effects models. The data from a rapid review on occupation and lower urinary tract symptoms by the Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Research Consortium are analyzed as a case study to estimate the prevalence of urinary incontinence and several incontinence subtypes among women in suspected high risk work environments.

Keywords: Bayesian methods; meta-analysis; missing data; prevalence; sensitivity analysis; urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Forest Plot of Study Level Estimates
Posterior mean and 95% credible interval of marginal and study level prevalences for each of the three outcomes across 26 studies
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Bivariate Density Plots for Predicted Prevalences in New Study
(a) Overall and SUI posterior predicted prevalences for new study based on original multivariate model results, (b) Overall and UUI with original multivariate model, (c) Overall and SUI with new parameterization, (d) Overall and UUI with new parameterization
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3. Sensitivity Analysis
Posterior mean and 95% credible intervals for UI, SUI, and UUI marginal prevalence across values of α2

References

    1. Haidich A Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010;14(1):29–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arends LR, Vokó Z, Stijnen T. Combining multiple outcome measures in a meta-analysis: an application. Statistics in Medicine 2003;22(8):1335–1353. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.1370. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bujkiewicz S, Thompson JR, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Harrison MJ, Symmons DPM, et al. Multivariate meta-analysis of mixed outcomes: a Bayesian approach. Statistics in Medicine 2013. September;32(22):3926–3943. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/sim.5831. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Efthimiou O, Mavridis D, Riley RD, Cipriani A, Salanti G. Joint synthesis of multiple correlated outcomes in networks of interventions. Biostatistics 2014;16(1):84–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Efthimious O, Debray TPA, van Valkenhoef G, Trelle S, Panayidou K, Moons KGM, et al. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology. Res Syn Meth 2016;7(3):236–263. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources