Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;97(6):400-405.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001516.

Technical Report: Repeatability of Contrast Sensitivity Test in Children

Affiliations

Technical Report: Repeatability of Contrast Sensitivity Test in Children

Rosa Hernández-Andrés et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity (CS) in children is not routinely measured in the clinical setting, although CS losses have been found in amblyopic and premature children. Thus simple visual acuity measurements do not completely assess their quality of vision. To evaluate contrast sensitivity in children, a reliable and easy test, sampling the entire spatial frequency range, is necessary.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and normal range of the contrast sensitivity function measured using the Topcon CC-100 instrument, in children aged between 4 and 9 years, for use as a diagnostic tool.

Methods: Contrast sensitivity was measured in 25 children, 11 boys and 14 girls, with normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity, normal binocular function, and stereopsis. Two measurements were performed, 3 months apart, with a Topcon CC-100 device using achromatic sinusoidal gratings of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) with random orientation in a circular window with sharp edges.

Results: The normal range in the first visit is wider than in the second. Coefficients of variation are better for the middle-range spatial frequencies (6.6 and 7.8% at 3 and 6 cpd, respectively) and worst at 18 cpd (18.2%), with intermediate values at 1.5 cpd (11.3%) and 12 cpd (13.7%), and better for older than for younger children. No significant sex differences were found (P > .05, Mann-Whitney U test).

Conclusions: Repeatability measured by the coefficient of variation is better for the middle frequency range (3 and 6 cpd) than for low (1.5 cpd) and high frequencies (12 and 18 cpd). The variability of the differences between the first and second measurements suggests that the participants were not able to maintain a stable response criterion. The test seems to be subject to a learning effect, and the standard normality range may not be adequate for children.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. De Valois RL, Albrecht DG, Thorell LG. Spatial Frequency Selectivity of Cells in Macaque Visual Cortex. Vision Res 1982;22:545–59.
    1. Campbell FW, Robson JG. Application of Fourier Analysis to the Visibility of Gratings. J Physiol 1968;197:551–66.
    1. Pelli DG, Bex P. Measuring Contrast Sensitivity. Vision Res 2013;90:10–4.
    1. Moseley MJ, Hill AR, et al. Contrast Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Practice. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:795–7.
    1. Ginsburg AP. Contrast Sensitivity and Functional Vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2003;43:5–15.

LinkOut - more resources